Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
FRAMES OF SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS: STRUCTURE AND FORMATION FEATURES
Corresponding Author(s) : El’vira Anvarovna Zeletdinova
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 7 No. 6 (2019): November
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The purpose of this article is to determine the features of the framing process, taking into account the methodological basis of the theory of frames.
Methodology: The methodological basis of the study is a theory of frames, as well as various methodological approaches aimed at searching for meaning, analyzing the characteristics of social consciousness, forming social representations. In order to clarify the issue of the formation and structure of a frame of social representations, theoretical-methodological concepts of a frame (Goffman, Bateson, Minsky, Fillmore) and social representations (Moscovici, Neisser) are analyzed. The main provisions of the structural-functional approach, the theory of social interactionism and constructivism are used.
Main Findings: The main provisions of the structural-functional approach, the theory of social interactionism and constructivism are used. As a result of analyzing the structure of frames of social representations, the author’s interpretation of the process of their formation is given, which makes it possible to better understand people’s understanding of already widespread and accepted social representations. Additions to the current understanding of the framing process and its nature allow for the applied research of social representations that underlie the studied social actions. The findings presented in the article, first of all, the conceptualization of basic concepts and generalization of extensive analytical material can serve as a prerequisite for further disciplinary (philosophy, sociology, political science, psychology, and others) and interdisciplinary developments in the field of frame research, monitoring and comparative research.
Applications of this study: The stated results can be used in analyzing the process of forming and determining the structure of frames of social representations.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The originality of the study lies in the author's interpretation of the formation of the frame of social representations, it's content and nature.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology (pp. 177-193). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Belyaevskaya, E.G. (1987). Semantika slova [The Semantics of the Word]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.
- Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Sotsialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow: Medium.
- Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
- Bovina, I.B. (2011). Strategii issledovaniya sotsialnykh predstavlenii [Strategies for the Study of Social Representations]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 3, 5-23.
- Buyakas, T.M. (2000). O problemakh stanovleniya chuvstva samoidentichnosti u studentov-psikhologov [On the Problems of the Formation of a Sense of Self-Identity among Students-Psychologists]. Vestnik Moskovskogo unniversiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, 1, 56-62.
- Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
- Durkheim, E. (1995). Predstavleniya individualnye i predstavleniya kollektivnye [Individual and Collective Representations]. In E. Durkheim, Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology. Its Subject, Method, Mission] (pp. 208-243). Moscow: Canon.
- Fillmore, C. (1988). Freimy i semantika ponimaniya [Frames and Semantics of Understanding]. In Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike [New in Foreign Linguistics] (Vol. XXIII, pp. 50-70). Moscow.
- Fraser, C. (1998). Attitudes, Social Representations and Widespread Beliefs. Papers on Social Representations, 3, 13-36.
- Gergen, K.J. (2001). Social Construction in Context. London: Sage.
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.
- Goffman, I. (2004). Analiz freimov: Esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta [Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Everyday Experience]. Moscow: RAS Institute of Sociology; Public Opinion Foundation.
- Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H.G. (2017). Shifting the Refugee Narrative? An Automated Frame Analysis of Europe’s 2015 Refugee Crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1749-1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813
- Johansson, C. (2007). Goffman's Sociology: An Inspiring Resource for Developing Public Relations Theory. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.006
- Kravchenko, S.A. (2008). Sotsiologiya: paradigmy cherez prizmu sotsiologicheskogo voobrazheniya [Sociology: Paradigms through the Prism of Sociological Imagination]. Moscow: Ekzamen.
- Makarov, M.L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of the Theory of Discourse]. Moscow: ITDGK "Gnosis".
- Minsky, M. (1979). Freimy dlya predstavleniya znanii [Frames for the Representation of Knowledge]. Moscow: Energiya.
- Moscovici, S. (1984). The Phenomenon of Social Representations. In R.M. Farr, & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations (pp. 3-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Neisser, W. (1981). Poznanie i realnost [Cognition and Reality]. Moscow: Progress.
- Parsons, T. (1968). Interaction. In The International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (Vol. 7).
- Pocheptsov, G.G. (2001). Teoriya kommunikatsii [Communication Theory]. Moscow.
- Rein, M., & Schon, D.A. (1977). Problem Setting in Policy Research. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making (pp. 235-251). Lexington: Lexington Books.
- Schmidt, R.Sr. (2000). Language Policy and Identity Politics in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- Tsurikova, L.V. (2001). Problemy kognitivnogo analiza diskursa v sovremennoi lingvistike [Problems of Cognitive Analysis of Discourse in Modern Linguistics]. Vestnik VGU. Seriya 1, Gumanitarnye nauki, 2.
- Urry, J. (1995). Consuming Places. London.
- Vakhshtayn, V.S. (2007). Pamyati Irvinga Gofmana [In Memory of Erving Goffman]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, 3(83), 141-151.
- Van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From Policy "Frames" to "Framing" Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533142
- Volkov, V. (1997). O kontseptsii praktik v sotsialnykh naukakh [On the Concept of Practices in Social Sciences]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 6.
- Wagner, W. (1998). Social Representations and Beyond: Brute Facts, Symbolic Coping and Domesticated Worlds. Culture and Psychology, 3(4), 297-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400302
- Yadov, V.A., Danilova, E.N., & Clement, K. (Eds.). (2010). Kak lyudi delayut sebya. Obychnye rossiyane v neobychnykh obstoyatelstvakh: kontseptualnoe osmyslenie vosmi nablyudavshikhsya sluchaev [How People Make Themselves. Ordinary Russians in Unusual Circumstances: A Conceptual Understanding of the Eight Observed Cases] (p. 20). Moscow: Logos. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700903525750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700903525750
- Yanow, D., & van Hulst, M. (2011). Politicy Frames: From Policy "Frames" to "Framing". Sociological Review, 10(1-2), 87-113.
References
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology (pp. 177-193). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Belyaevskaya, E.G. (1987). Semantika slova [The Semantics of the Word]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Sotsialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow: Medium.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
Bovina, I.B. (2011). Strategii issledovaniya sotsialnykh predstavlenii [Strategies for the Study of Social Representations]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 3, 5-23.
Buyakas, T.M. (2000). O problemakh stanovleniya chuvstva samoidentichnosti u studentov-psikhologov [On the Problems of the Formation of a Sense of Self-Identity among Students-Psychologists]. Vestnik Moskovskogo unniversiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, 1, 56-62.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Durkheim, E. (1995). Predstavleniya individualnye i predstavleniya kollektivnye [Individual and Collective Representations]. In E. Durkheim, Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology. Its Subject, Method, Mission] (pp. 208-243). Moscow: Canon.
Fillmore, C. (1988). Freimy i semantika ponimaniya [Frames and Semantics of Understanding]. In Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike [New in Foreign Linguistics] (Vol. XXIII, pp. 50-70). Moscow.
Fraser, C. (1998). Attitudes, Social Representations and Widespread Beliefs. Papers on Social Representations, 3, 13-36.
Gergen, K.J. (2001). Social Construction in Context. London: Sage.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.
Goffman, I. (2004). Analiz freimov: Esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta [Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Everyday Experience]. Moscow: RAS Institute of Sociology; Public Opinion Foundation.
Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H.G. (2017). Shifting the Refugee Narrative? An Automated Frame Analysis of Europe’s 2015 Refugee Crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1749-1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813
Johansson, C. (2007). Goffman's Sociology: An Inspiring Resource for Developing Public Relations Theory. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.006
Kravchenko, S.A. (2008). Sotsiologiya: paradigmy cherez prizmu sotsiologicheskogo voobrazheniya [Sociology: Paradigms through the Prism of Sociological Imagination]. Moscow: Ekzamen.
Makarov, M.L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of the Theory of Discourse]. Moscow: ITDGK "Gnosis".
Minsky, M. (1979). Freimy dlya predstavleniya znanii [Frames for the Representation of Knowledge]. Moscow: Energiya.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The Phenomenon of Social Representations. In R.M. Farr, & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations (pp. 3-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neisser, W. (1981). Poznanie i realnost [Cognition and Reality]. Moscow: Progress.
Parsons, T. (1968). Interaction. In The International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (Vol. 7).
Pocheptsov, G.G. (2001). Teoriya kommunikatsii [Communication Theory]. Moscow.
Rein, M., & Schon, D.A. (1977). Problem Setting in Policy Research. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making (pp. 235-251). Lexington: Lexington Books.
Schmidt, R.Sr. (2000). Language Policy and Identity Politics in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Tsurikova, L.V. (2001). Problemy kognitivnogo analiza diskursa v sovremennoi lingvistike [Problems of Cognitive Analysis of Discourse in Modern Linguistics]. Vestnik VGU. Seriya 1, Gumanitarnye nauki, 2.
Urry, J. (1995). Consuming Places. London.
Vakhshtayn, V.S. (2007). Pamyati Irvinga Gofmana [In Memory of Erving Goffman]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, 3(83), 141-151.
Van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From Policy "Frames" to "Framing" Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533142
Volkov, V. (1997). O kontseptsii praktik v sotsialnykh naukakh [On the Concept of Practices in Social Sciences]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 6.
Wagner, W. (1998). Social Representations and Beyond: Brute Facts, Symbolic Coping and Domesticated Worlds. Culture and Psychology, 3(4), 297-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400302
Yadov, V.A., Danilova, E.N., & Clement, K. (Eds.). (2010). Kak lyudi delayut sebya. Obychnye rossiyane v neobychnykh obstoyatelstvakh: kontseptualnoe osmyslenie vosmi nablyudavshikhsya sluchaev [How People Make Themselves. Ordinary Russians in Unusual Circumstances: A Conceptual Understanding of the Eight Observed Cases] (p. 20). Moscow: Logos. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700903525750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700903525750
Yanow, D., & van Hulst, M. (2011). Politicy Frames: From Policy "Frames" to "Framing". Sociological Review, 10(1-2), 87-113.