Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
THE REVITALIZATION MODEL OF WAN ABDURRAHMAN FOREST PARK AS A COMMUNAL FORESTRY CONSERVATION AREA
Corresponding Author(s) : Erlina Bachri
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 7 No. 6 (2019): November
Abstract
Purpose of study: This study aimed to develop a model of social planning and legal perspectives on forest park revitalization program. Which in this study forest park that will be examined is Abdurahman Wan forest park in Lampung province, Indonesia as communal-based nature conservation programs are guided by the principles of participation, utilization, harmonization, and sustainability?
Methodology: This study is a qualitative study using juridical and sociological perspectives by evaluating and comparing the Top-down and Bottom-up plans that have been done before. The SWOT analysis has been done for analyzing the data.
Result: The results of the study show that the "Top-down Planning" that has been done so far is not sufficient. This is because the legislature is not only limited to a basic concept but must also play a role in developing all strategic arrangements. Therefore, in this case, the government is not merely a member of parliament but oversees the course of the program. Also, the community must have broad access to fight for its communal values. In short, the study found that the "Bottom-Up Planning" model was more suitable for implementation because through this approach the community could participate and exchange ideas together in all policies.
Implications: This research is very useful for stakeholders because it can provide academic illustrations in the form of policy analysis and is able to force public participation and ensure that all policies are shared values ​​and collaborative in nature that provide so many assets related to the form of public policy in implementing activities in the park communal forest.
Applications of this study: This research can be used for the universities, managers, and policymakers.
Novelty/Originality of this study: In this research, the model of forest park conservation programs using communal-based based on participation, utilization, harmonization, and sustainability.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Angelsen, A., &Wunder, S. (2003). Exploring the forest—poverty link. CIFOR occasional paper, 40, 1-20.
- Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003).Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for" Asymmetric Paternalism". University of Pennsylvania law review, 151(3), 1211-1254. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312889
- Colchester, M. (1994).Sustaining the forests: the communityâ€based approach in the south and southâ€east Asia. Development and Change, 25(1), 69-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00510.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00510.x
- Cubbage, F., Harou, P., & Sills, E. (2007). Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. Forest policy and economics, 9(7), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010
- Daily, G. (2003). What are ecosystem services? Global environmental challenges for the twenty-first century: Resources, consumption and sustainable solutions, 227-231.
- Gross, C. (2007). Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2727-2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013
- Indrarto, G. B., Murharjanti, P., Katharina, J., Pulungan, I., Ivalerina, F., Rahman, J., ...&Muharrom, E. (2012). The context of REDD+ in Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
- Jamal, T., &Stronza, A. (2009). Collaboration theory and tourism practice in protected areas: Stakeholders, structuring and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741
- Kaskoyo, H., Mohammed, A. J., & Inoue, M. (2014). Present State of Community Forestry (HutanKemasyarakatan/HKm) Program in Forest and Its Challenges: Case Study in Lampung Province, Indonesia. Journal of Forest Science, 30(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2014.30.1.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2014.30.1.15
- Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1546-1551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
- Mochtar, K. (2002). Konsep-konsepHukumdalam Pembangunan. Alumni, Bandung. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
- Mohamed, N. (1995). Conservation in Malaysia: landscape, tourism, and culture. Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
- Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of environmental planning and management, 51(3), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560801977190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560801977190
- Nguon, P., &Kulakowski, D. (2013).Natural forest disturbances and the design of REDD+ initiatives. Environmental science & policy, 33, 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.011
- Ogus, A. I. (2004). Regulation: Legal form and economic theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Porter-Bolland, L., Ellis, E. A., Guariguata, M. R., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., & Reyes-GarcÃa, V. (2012). Community managed forests and forest protected areas: An assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest ecology and management, 268, 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034
- Posner, R. A. (1995). Overcoming law. Harvard University Press.
- Roseland, M. (2000). Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in planning, 54(2), 73-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9
- Sahide, M. A. K., & Giessen, L. (2015). The fragmented land-use administration in Indonesia–Analysing bureaucratic responsibilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems. Land Use Policy, 43, 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.005
- Schroeder-Wildberg, E., &Carius, A. (2003). Illegal logging, conflict and the business sector in Indonesia. InWEnt-Capacity Building International.
- Singagerda, F. S., Alfian, F.Y., Jatiningrum, C., Meliyanti (2019). The business strategy and supply chain management performance in a transitioning economy. International Journal of Supply Chain, 8(4), 577-588.
- Soekanto, S. (2008).Faktor-Faktor Yang MempengaruhiPenegakanHukum, Jakarta: PT. Raja GrafindoPersada.
- Spangenberg, J. H. (2010). The growth discourse, growth policy, and sustainable development: two thought experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.007
- Sunderlin, W. D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L., &Wunder, S. (2005). Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development, 33(9), 1383-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004
- Thompson, H. (1999). Social forestry: An analysis of the Indonesian forestry policy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339980000311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339980000311
- Wijaya, Y. P. (2014). HakekatNilaidan Moral Serta SosialisasinyaDalamKehidupanManusia. Unpublished paper.
- Winkel, G. (2012). Foucault in the forests—A review of the use of ‘Foucauldian’concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.009
- http://www.menlhk.go.id/siaran-81-pencegahan-karhutla-berhasil-tekan-angka-deforestasi.html accessed 29 June 2018.
- https://lampung.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2019/12/16/752/perkembangan-ekspor-dan-impor-provinsi-lampung--november-2019.html
References
Angelsen, A., &Wunder, S. (2003). Exploring the forest—poverty link. CIFOR occasional paper, 40, 1-20.
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003).Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for" Asymmetric Paternalism". University of Pennsylvania law review, 151(3), 1211-1254. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312889
Colchester, M. (1994).Sustaining the forests: the communityâ€based approach in the south and southâ€east Asia. Development and Change, 25(1), 69-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00510.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00510.x
Cubbage, F., Harou, P., & Sills, E. (2007). Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. Forest policy and economics, 9(7), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010
Daily, G. (2003). What are ecosystem services? Global environmental challenges for the twenty-first century: Resources, consumption and sustainable solutions, 227-231.
Gross, C. (2007). Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2727-2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013
Indrarto, G. B., Murharjanti, P., Katharina, J., Pulungan, I., Ivalerina, F., Rahman, J., ...&Muharrom, E. (2012). The context of REDD+ in Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Jamal, T., &Stronza, A. (2009). Collaboration theory and tourism practice in protected areas: Stakeholders, structuring and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741
Kaskoyo, H., Mohammed, A. J., & Inoue, M. (2014). Present State of Community Forestry (HutanKemasyarakatan/HKm) Program in Forest and Its Challenges: Case Study in Lampung Province, Indonesia. Journal of Forest Science, 30(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2014.30.1.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2014.30.1.15
Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1546-1551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
Mochtar, K. (2002). Konsep-konsepHukumdalam Pembangunan. Alumni, Bandung. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
Mohamed, N. (1995). Conservation in Malaysia: landscape, tourism, and culture. Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of environmental planning and management, 51(3), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560801977190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560801977190
Nguon, P., &Kulakowski, D. (2013).Natural forest disturbances and the design of REDD+ initiatives. Environmental science & policy, 33, 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.011
Ogus, A. I. (2004). Regulation: Legal form and economic theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Porter-Bolland, L., Ellis, E. A., Guariguata, M. R., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., & Reyes-GarcÃa, V. (2012). Community managed forests and forest protected areas: An assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest ecology and management, 268, 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.034
Posner, R. A. (1995). Overcoming law. Harvard University Press.
Roseland, M. (2000). Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in planning, 54(2), 73-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9
Sahide, M. A. K., & Giessen, L. (2015). The fragmented land-use administration in Indonesia–Analysing bureaucratic responsibilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems. Land Use Policy, 43, 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.005
Schroeder-Wildberg, E., &Carius, A. (2003). Illegal logging, conflict and the business sector in Indonesia. InWEnt-Capacity Building International.
Singagerda, F. S., Alfian, F.Y., Jatiningrum, C., Meliyanti (2019). The business strategy and supply chain management performance in a transitioning economy. International Journal of Supply Chain, 8(4), 577-588.
Soekanto, S. (2008).Faktor-Faktor Yang MempengaruhiPenegakanHukum, Jakarta: PT. Raja GrafindoPersada.
Spangenberg, J. H. (2010). The growth discourse, growth policy, and sustainable development: two thought experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.007
Sunderlin, W. D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L., &Wunder, S. (2005). Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development, 33(9), 1383-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004
Thompson, H. (1999). Social forestry: An analysis of the Indonesian forestry policy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339980000311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339980000311
Wijaya, Y. P. (2014). HakekatNilaidan Moral Serta SosialisasinyaDalamKehidupanManusia. Unpublished paper.
Winkel, G. (2012). Foucault in the forests—A review of the use of ‘Foucauldian’concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.009
http://www.menlhk.go.id/siaran-81-pencegahan-karhutla-berhasil-tekan-angka-deforestasi.html accessed 29 June 2018.