Issue
Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of 
PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVES OF VERBAL HUMOR IN AN AMERICAN SITCOM
Corresponding Author(s) : Chairina Nasir
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): May
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aimed at finding out the types of illocutionary acts which create humor effect in the sitcom The Big Bang Theory Episode The Thespian Catalyst (S04E14).
Methodology: A descriptive qualitative study with the pragmatic approach of illocutionary acts suggested by Searle (1975) was undertaken by observing the utterances spoken by all the characters in the sitcom.
Main findings: The results of the study showed that there were four types of illocutionary acts found in the sitcom; assertive, directive, commissive, and expressive. Those illocutionary acts also flouted the maxim of Cooperative Principles, i.e. quality and relevance. In conclusion, it can be known that the humor that occurred in the sitcom is the result of the way the characters conveyed illocutionary acts that also have flouted the maxim as in the Cooperative Principles.
Applications of this study: This study is expected to be a reference for other studies in the field of pragmatics particularly in illocutionary acts.
Novelty/Originality of this study:This current study, however, would discuss The Big Bang Theory sitcom by using the Illocutionary Act framework proposed by Searle (1975).
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
Allan, K., &Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2015). Pragmatics: The state of the art (An online interview with Keith Allan). International Journal of Language Studies, 9(3), 147-154.
Amalia, R. M. (2017).Use of implicit performative utterances at the University of Padjadjaran and the University of Pennsylvania. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(1), 66-75.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i1.7005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i1.7005
Ariefandi, F. (2018). Ilokusi yang memberikan efek humor kepada pembaca dalam Manga Azumanga Daioh [Illocution that gives the effect of humor to the reader of Manga Azumanga Daioh]. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 14(2), 118-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v14i2.2324
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Berlyne, D. (1972). Humor and it is kin. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. Mhee (Eds.), Psychology of humor (pp. 43-60). Academic Press.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50008-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50008-0
Bloomer, A., Griffiths, P., &Merrison, R. J. (2005). Introducing language in use. Routledge.
Bogdan, R., &Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn& Bacon.
Critchley, S. (2002). On humor. Routledge.
Cutting, J. (2005). Pragmatics and discourse: A sourcebook for students. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994597
Dynel, M. (2009).Humorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gelkopf, M. (2011).The use of humor in serious mental illness: A review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine,8(1), 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep106
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Gusthini, M., Sobarna, C., &Amalia, R. M. (2018). A pragmatic study of speech as an instrument of power: Analysis of the 2016 US Presidential Debate. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(1), 97-113.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i1.6906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i1.6906
Hart, M. (2007). Humour and social protest: An introduction.International Review of Social History, 52, 1-20.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859007003094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859007003094
Hu, S. (2012). An analysis of humor in The Big Bang Theory from pragmatic perspectives. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1185-1190. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.6.1185-1190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.6.1185-1190
Justová, V. (2006). Direct and indirect speech acts in English. (Bachelor’s thesis). Masaryk University, Brno.
Kehinde, O. F. (2016). A night of a thousand laughs: A pragmatic study of humor in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 6(6), 433-437.
Kiuk, P. W., &Ghozali, I. (2018). Speech acts analysis in Desmond’s conversation in the “Hacksaw Ridge” movie. Journal of English Language and Language Teaching (JELLT), 2(1), 59-72.https://doi.org/10.36597/jellt.v2i1.2715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36597/jellt.v2i1.2715
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313
Ma, Z., & Jiang, M. (2013). Interpretation of verbal humor in the sitcom The Big Bang Theory from the Perspective of Adaptation-relevance Theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2220-2226.https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2220-2226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2220-2226
Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press.
Parahoo, K. (1997). Nursing research: Principles, process, and issues. McMillan Press.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14559-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14559-1
Ritchie, G. (2004). The linguistic analysis of jokes. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406953
Sameer, I. H. (2017). Analysis of speech act patterns in two Egyptian inaugural speeches.Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 134-147.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i2.7271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i2.7271
Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. University of Minnesota Press.
Sherman, J. (2003). Using authentic video in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, M. (1992). The effects of context on utterance interpretation: Some questions and some answers. In R. P. Botha, M. Sinclair & W. Winckler (Eds.), Linguistics for the language professions 1: Part B (pp. 61–90). SPIL PLUS 22. https://doi.org/10.5842/22-0-503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5842/22-0-503
Soedjatmiko, W. (1991). Aspek linguistik dan sosio kultural dalam humor. [Linguistic and socio-cultural aspects in humor]. Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya. Jakarta.
Wardoyo, C. (2015). AnalysishumorDalamtindaktutur di serial komedi “Preman Pensiun” [Analysis of humor in speech acts in the comedy series “Preman Pensiun”]. Proceedings of the Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atmajaya (Kolita) ke-13 (pp. 1-6).Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta.
Wijana, I. D. P. (1995). Wacana kartun dalam bahasa Indonesia [Cartoon discourse in Indonesian]. (Doctoral dissertation). Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta.
