Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 7, 2020
Accepted
October 19, 2020
Published
October 24, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 621 Download : 351

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the processes at work in shaping students’ entrepreneurial intentions following training courses in entrepreneurship, and of the gap between entrepreneurial intention and action often seen in these training devices. The goal is to collect information that is difficult to access through the usual methods of evaluating entrepreneurial intentions by shedding light on ways in which students make use of these devices.


Methodology: Exploratory qualitative research (comprehensive case study) carried out as part of an Entrepreneurial Training Device (Professional Master’s Degree) at a business school in Tunisia, using participant observation techniques, supplemented and cross-checked with multiple data types (institutional records reflecting educational intentions, regular interactions with students, etc.).


Main Findings: The Entrepreneurship Training Device is put at the service of the goals to be accomplished by the students (obtaining a Master’s degree, expanding their studies, increasing their chances of re-enrolling a more typical/ “prestigious†course).


Applications of this study: The research can be used in various disciplines (entrepreneurship, the science of education, sociology), and in various fields: the design and evaluation of entrepreneurship instruments, assessment of the entrepreneurial intentions of students, correlations and differences between entrepreneurial purpose and behavior, cultural variations in entrepreneurship, determinants of the choice of an entrepreneurial career, social representations of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship.


Novelty/Originality of this study: The mobilization of the Sociology of uses enables a deeper understanding of the motives and logics of action of students enrolling in a specialized Master’s Degree in Entrepreneurship in Tunisia, and a better understanding of the degree to which these motives and logics help them to participate effectively in an entrepreneurial intention phase.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Training Device Intention-based Models Entrepreneurial Intention-action Gap Sociology of Uses Tunisia

Article Details

License

Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. IJMIER is SHERPA ROMEO Journal. 

Publishing License

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of  Creative Commons License

How to Cite
Taktak-Kallel, I. (2020). RECONSIDERING THE ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION-ACTION GAP FOR STUDENTS TRAINED IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN TUNISIA: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIOLOGY OF USES. International Journal of Management, Innovation & Entrepreneurial Research, 6(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijmier.2020.6210
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abbès, I., Amari, F., & Allaya, A. (2016). Impact de l’enseignement de l’entrepreneuriat sur l’intention d’entreprendre. Communication présentée à la XXVème Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique (Hammamet, 30 mai-1er juin). https://www.strategie-aims.com/events/conferences/27-xxveme-conference-de-l-aims/communications/3943-impact-de-l-enseignement-de-l-entrepreneuriat-sur-l-intention-d-entreprend re/download.
  2. Abdennadher, S.,& Boudabbous, S. (2014). Rôle du parcours scolaire dans l’acte entrepreneurial : cas du contexte tunisien. Recherches&éducations, 12(1), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheseducations.2284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheseducations.2284
  3. Adam, A.-F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). Bridging the entrepreneurial intention-behaviour gap: The role of commitment and implementation intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 25(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2015.068775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2015.068775
  4. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1987).Qualitative Research Methods:Membership roles in field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984973
  5. Ajzen, I. (1991).The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  6. Ajzen, I.&Fishbein, M.(1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood. Prentice-Hall :Cliffs (NJ).
  7. Albero, B. (2010). La formation en tant que dispositif : du terme au concept. InB. Charlier&F. Henri(Eds.),La technologie de l’éducation :recherches, pratiques et perspectives(pp. 47-59).Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, coll. "Apprendre". https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.charl.2010.01.0047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.charl.2010.01.0047
  8. Armitage, C.J., &Conner,M.(2001).Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
  9. Autio, E., Keelyey, R., Klofsten, M., & Ulfstedt, T. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: Testing and intent model in Asia, Scandinavia, and United States. In Reynolds,P.D. (Ed.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1997: Proceedings of the seventeenth annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference(pp. 133-147). Wellesley, Mass.: Babson College.
  10. Bachelet, C.(2004).Usages des TIC dans les organisations, une notion à revisiter ?.Actes du IXème colloque AIM INT d’Evry (Evry, 26-28 mai). http://www.aim2004.int-evry.fr/pdf/Aim04_Bachelet.pdf
  11. Bachiri, M. (2016). Les déterminants de l’intention entrepreneuriale des étudiants, quels enseignements pour l’université marocaine ?. Management & Avenir, 89(7), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.089.0109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.089.0109
  12. Ben Nasr, K., & Boujelbene, Y. (2014). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education. 2nd World Conference On Business, Economics And Management - WCBEM2013, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109 (2014), 712–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.534
  13. Bernard, H.R.(2002).Participant observation. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(pp. 322-364). Oxford: Alta Mira Press (Rowman & Litlefield Publishers), Third edition.
  14. Berthiaume, D.(2004).L’observation de l’enfant en milieu éducatif. Montréal: G. Morin.
  15. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case of intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306970
  16. Bogdan, R.&Taylor, S.J.(1975).Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  17. Boissin, J.-P., Chollet, B. & Emin, S. (2009). Les déterminants de l'intention de créer une entreprise chez les étudiants : un test empirique. M@n@gement, 12(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.121.0028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.121.0028
  18. Boissin, J.-P.,&Emin, S.(2007).Les étudiants et l’entrepreneuriat: l’effet des formations. Gestion 2000, 24(3), 25-42.
  19. Boissin, J.-P., Favre-Bonté, V., & Fine-Falcy, S. (2017). Diverse impacts of the determinants of entrepreneurial intention: Three Submodels, Three Student Profiles. Revue de l’entrepreneuriat, 16(3-4), 17-43. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.163.0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.163.0017
  20. Bordeaux, M.-C. (2014). Pour un réexamen de la notion d’usage : la dimension culturelle de l’expérience. Lendemains - Études allemandes comparées sur la France, 154-155, 76-100. https://alfea.hypotheses.org/files/2016/09/Bordeaux_2014-Lendemains-Pour-un-r%C3%A9examen-de-la-notion-dusage-mis-en-forme-14-sept-2014.pdf.
  21. Boudabbous, S. (2011). L’intention entrepreneuriale des jeunes diplômés. Revue Libanaise de Gestion et d’Economie, 6(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1999-7620(11)70033-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1999-7620(11)70033-7
  22. Boudjaoui, M., &Leclercq, G. (2014). Revisiter le concept de dispositif pour comprendre l’alternance en formation. Éducation et francophonie, 42(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.7202/1024563ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1024563ar
  23. Bourdet, J.-F., &Leroux Lavoisier, P.(2009).Dispositifs de formation en ligne. De leur analyse à leur appropriation. Distances et savoirs, 1(7), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.3166/ds.7.11-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/ds.7.11-29
  24. Bourdieu, P. (2003). L’objectivation participante. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, « Regards croisés sur l'anthropologie de Pierre Bourdieu », 150, décembre, 43-58. https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.2003.2770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.2003.2770
  25. Bruyat, C. (1993).Création d’entreprise : contributions épistémologiques et modélisation(Thèse de doctorat ès sciences de gestion).Université Pierre–Mendez, Grenoble 2, France.
  26. Caudron, F., &Ibert, J. (2017). La Formation à l’Entrepreneuriat à l’Épreuve du Réel : Bilan de 5 Années de Licence Professionnelle des Métiers de l’Entrepreneuriat. Revue ManagementS, Dossier N°1: Perspectives africaines, 1er Juillet. https://www.revue-managements.com/category/dossiers/perspectives-africaines/
  27. (de) Certeau, M.(1980).L’invention du quotidien. Tome 1 : Arts de faire. Paris : Gallimard.
  28. Chabaud, D., Sammut, S., & Degeorge, J.-M. (2017). De l’intention à l’action entrepreneuriale: antécédents, écarts et chainons manquants. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 16(3), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.163.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.163.0007
  29. Chambard, O. (2014). L’éducation des étudiants à l’esprit d’entreprendre : entre promotion d’une idéologie de l’entreprise et ouverture de perspectives émancipatrices. Formation emploi, 127, 7-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/formationemploi.4236
  30. Chauvin, S., & Jounin, N. (2010).L’observation directe. In L’enquête sociologique (pp.143 165). Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.paug.2012.01.0143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.paug.2012.01.0143
  31. Degeorge, J.M., &Fayolle, A. (2008). Is entrepreneurial intention stable through time? First insights from a sample of French students. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 5(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2008.015951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2008.015951
  32. Denis, J.(2009).Une autre sociologie des usages ? Pistes et postures pour l’étude des chaînes sociotechniques. Article de synthèse pour le programme TIC & Migrations (MSH Paris), septembre, ffhalshs-00641283f. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00641283/document
  33. Dhaoui, I. (2016). L’enseignement supérieur en Tunisie : Dynamiques et analyses de la performance. Institut Tunisien de la Compétitivité et des Etudes Quantitatives (ITCEQ), Etude n°1, février.
  34. Donckels, R. (1991). Education and Entrepreneurship Experience from Secondary and University Education in Belgium. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise, 9(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.1991.10600389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.1991.10600389
  35. Elfving, J, Brännback, M., &Carsrud, A. (2017). Motivations matter in entrepreneurial behavior: depends on the context. In M.Brännback&A.L. Carsrud (Eds.),Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind(pp.83-89). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45544-0_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45544-0_14
  36. Elias, N.(1993).Engagement et distanciation : contributions à la sociologie de la connaissance. Paris : Fayard.
  37. Fayolle, A.(2004).Evaluation de l’impact des programmes d’enseignement en entrepreneuriat: Vers de nouvelles approches. Communication présentée au 7ème Congrès international Francophone en entrepreneuriat et PME (Montpellier, 27-29 octobre).
  38. Fayolle, A., & Castagnos, J.-C.(2006).Impact des formations à l’entrepreneuriat: vers de nouvelles méthodes d’évaluation. Management international, 10(4), 43-52.
  39. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2009). Évaluation d'une formation en entrepreneuriat : prédispositions et impact sur l'intention d'entreprendre. M@n@gement, 12(3), 176-203. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.123.0176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.123.0176
  40. Fayolle, A., &Linan, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024
  41. Franke, N., &Luthje, C. (2004).Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business Students - A benchmarking study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877004000209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877004000209
  42. Frau-Meigs, D. (2005).Usages, In Commission nationale française pour l’Unesco, La « société de l’information » : glossaire critique(pp. 139-141). Paris : La Documentation française.
  43. Gartner, W.B.,&Vesper, K.H. (1994).Executive forum: Experiments in Entrepreneurship Education, Successes and Failures. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90028-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90028-0
  44. (von)Graevenitz, G., Harhoff, D.,& Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of EconomicBehavior and Organization, 76(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.015
  45. Hlady-Rispal, M.(2002).La méthode des cas – Application à la recherche en gestion. Bruxelles : De Boeck Université. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.hlady.2002.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.hlady.2002.01
  46. Jemli, H. (2018). Effet de l’enseignement de l’entrepreneuriat sur l’intention entrepreneuriale des étudiants inscrits dans les écoles tunisiennes d’ingénieurs. Revue Marché et Organisations, 33(3), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.3917/maorg.033.0145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/maorg.033.0145
  47. Jones, B., &Iredale, N.(2010).Enterprise education as pedagogy. Education and Training, 52(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017654
  48. Jouët, J.(2000).Retour critique sur la sociologie des usages. Réseaux, 100(18), 487-521. https://doi.org/10.3406/reso.2000.2235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/reso.2000.2235
  49. Junker, B.H. (1960).Field work: an introduction to the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  50. Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(3), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602100104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602000302
  51. Krueger, N.F., & Brazeal, D.V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 19(3), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800307
  52. Krueger, N.F., & Carsrud, A.L. (1993).Entrepreneurial intentions: applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000020
  53. Labazée, P.(2002).Les entrepreneurs entre le local et le global. Les Temps Modernes, 620-621(4-5), 357-391. https://doi.org/10.3917/ltm.620.0357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ltm.620.0357
  54. Lakhal, S., H’mida, S., Olivier, C., & Dondassé, I. (2006).La mesure de la motivation entrepreneuriale chez les jeunes Acadiens francophones. Communication présentée au 23ème Colloque annuel du Conseil canadien des PME et de l’entrepreneuriat (Trois–Rivières, Canada).
  55. Langouët, G.(1986).Innovations pédagogiques et technologies éducatives. Revue Française de pédagogie, 76(1), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.1986.1499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.1986.1499
  56. Lapassade, G.(1991).L’ethnosociologie: Les sources anglo-saxonnes. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.
  57. Leung, K.-Y., Lo, C.-T., Sun, H., & Wong, K.-F. (2012). Factors influencing engineering students’ intention to participate in on-campus entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 15 (ISSNs: 1098-8394, ISSN (Electronic): 1528-2651), 1–20.
  58. Linan, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2006).Testing the Entrepreneurial Intention Model on a Two-Country Sample. Working Paper 200607, Department of Business Economics, UniversitatAutonoma de Barcelona.
  59. Moreau, R., &Raveleau, B.(2006).Les trajectoires de l’intention entrepreneuriale. Revue internationale P.M.E., 19 (2), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.7202/1008497ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1008497ar
  60. Noel, T.W. (2001). Effects of Entrepreneurial Education on Intent to Open a Business, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, in Babson Conference Proceedings, 78-146, available at: www.babson.edu/entrep/fer
  61. Oliveira, A., &Rua, O.L. (2018). From intention to entrepreneurial action: Assessing the impact of the barriers on the creation of new organizations. RAUSP Management Journal, 53(4), 507-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2018-0039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2018-0039
  62. Olivier de Sardan, J.-P.(2008).La rigueur du qualitatif : Les contraintes empiriques de l’interprétation socio-anthropologique. Coll. Anthropologie prospective. Bruxelles : Academia-Bruylant.
  63. Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M.,& Ijsselstein, A. (2010).The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54(3), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002
  64. Ozgen, E., & Minsky, B. D. (2013). Why some college students engage in entrepreneurial activities while others do not. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16(1), 45–58.
  65. Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., Pickernell, D., & Brychan, T. (2010).Attitudes towards entrepreneurship education: A comparative analysis. Education & Training, 52(8/9), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011088926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011088926
  66. Pepin, M. (2011). L’entrepreneuriat en milieu scolaire : de quoi s’agit-il?.Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill, 46(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.7202/1006441ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1006441ar
  67. Peterman, N.E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise Education : Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00035.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00035.x
  68. Pihie, Z.A.L.,& Bagheri, A. (2009).Entrepreneurial Intention of University Students. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change Management: Annual Review, 9, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v09i04/49734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v09i04/49734
  69. Pittaway, L.,& Cope, J. (2007).Entrepreneurship education –a systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607080656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607080656
  70. Robinson, P.B., Stimpson, D.V., Huefner, J.C., & Hunt, H.K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101500405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101500405
  71. Scheinberg, S., &MacMillan, I.C. (1988). An 11-country study of motivations to start a business. In B.A Kirchoff, W.A. Long, W.E. McMullan, K.H. Vesper &W.E. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 669 – 687). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
  72. Schlaegel, C.,& Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a metaâ€analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12087
  73. Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982).The social dimensions of Entrepreneurship, In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton& K.H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72-90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  74. Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2006). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students ? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002
  75. Soulé, B. (2007).Observation participante ou participation observante? Usages et justifications de la notion de participation observante en sciences sociales. Recherches qualitatives, 27(1), 127-140.
  76. Steiner, P. (2017). L’usage : quelques modes d’emploi. Cahiers COSTECH,1, 3 mai. http://www.costech.utc.fr/CahiersCOSTECH/spip.php?article13
  77. Tkachev, A., &Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among Russian students. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(3), 269- 280. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856299283209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/089856299283209
  78. Toumi, M., & Smida, A. (2017). L’échec au passage à l’acte entrepreneurial des diplômés issus d’une formation entrepreneuriale en Tunisie : Rôle de la culture. Communication présentée au 10ème Congrès de l’Académie de l’Entrepreneuriat et de l’Innovation AEI (Dakar, 6-8 décembre). http://entrepreneuriat.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Toumi.pdf
  79. Van Gelderen, M., Kautonen, T., & Fink, M. (2015). From entrepreneurial intentions to actions: Self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.003
  80. Verzat, C. (2011). “Esprit d’entreprendre, es-tu là ?†Mais de quoi parle-t-on ? Entreprendre & Innover, 11-12, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.3917/entin.011.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/entin.011.0007
  81. Wacheux, F.(1996).Méthodes qualitatives et recherche en gestion. Collection « Gestion », Série : Politique générale, Finance et Marketing. Paris : Economica.
  82. Wang, Y.& Verzat, C. (2011). Generalist or specific studies for engineering entrepreneurs?: Comparison of French engineering students’ trajectories in two different curricula. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(2), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111127124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111127124