Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore what market knowledge of the travel industry involves. Although there has been consensus that market knowledge is drawn from the market orientation theory, little insight into the nature and issue of market knowledge from the knowledge-based view is identified. Thus, our aim is to fill this gap in the market knowledge of tourism literature.


To this end, this study adopts the discovery-oriented approach of qualitative study to delineate the domain of the market knowledge construct in the travel industry setting.


The study interviewed two companies and summarized four categories of 4C market knowledge: Knowledge of external customer (customer) including customer profile, traveler’s psychology and behavior, and customer relationships management; internal customer (employee) including employee equity, workforce management, and performance control; competitor, including competitive status and competitive response; and partner client (supplier and distributor), including partners’ characteristics and supply chain management.


This study provides operational definitions and a legible framework of market knowledge for directing future research.

Keywords

Market knowledge Knowledge-based view Market orientation Travel industry

Article Details

How to Cite
Chen, K.-Y. (2015). What Should be Known to Conduct in the Travel Industry? Extending to Knowledge-based View. International Journal of Tourism & Hospitality Reviews, 2(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijthr.2015.217

References

  1. Berg, B.L. (2004). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. Boston Mass: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
  2. Caddy, I., Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2001). Managing orphan knowledge: Current australasian best practice. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 384-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930110409679
  3. De Luca, L.M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.095
  4. Hallin, C.A., & Marnburg, E. (2008). Knowledge management in the hospitality industry: A review of empirical research. Tourism Management, 29(2), 366-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.02.019
  5. Hu, M.L., Horng, J.S., & Sun, Y.H. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.009
  6. Nieves, J., & Haller, S. (2014). Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40(1), 224-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.010
  7. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5 (1), 14-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  8. Shaw, G., & Williams, A. (2009). Knowledge transfer and management in tourism: An emerging research agenda. Tourism Management, 30(3), 325-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.023
  9. Sinkula, J.M. (1994). Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 35-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800103
  10. Weidenfeld, A., Williams, A.M., & Butler, R.W. (2010). Knowledge transfer and innovation among attractions. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 604-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.12.001
  11. Yang, J.T. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sharing in international tourist hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.05.004
  12. Yang, J.T., & Wan, C.S. (2004). Advancing roles and functions for knowledge management coordination. Tourism Management, 25(5), 593-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.002
  13. Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.