Publication Probability Calculator

Dear researcher, use these qualities parameters to evaluate the publication probability of your article. We advise you to take help from your peer to evaluate your paper as per the following parameters and then use the decision matrix to assess the publication probability.  

   
Quality Parameters    		    
Strongly agree   		    
Agree   		    
Not agree   
   
Title: Highly   simple language to understand the intention of study in the first   reading.     		    
10   		    
7   		    
3   
   
Abstract    
i. Purpose (crystal clear or two lines)    
10   		    
7   		    
3   
ii. Methodology (mention only theory, tools, and methods, etc. no discussion)    
5   		    
3   		    
1   
iii. Main findings (mention only the main results in 3 lines)    
5   		    
3   		    
1   
iv. Implications (tell 3 lines how and where this study can be useful) and    
5   		    
3   		    
1   
v. The novelty of the study (something new in this study that can attract readers)    
10   		    
7   		    
3   
   
Keywords: 5 to 6 good, Google searchable, keywords that truly represent the intention   of research in 5 words. Don’t use phrases, only words.    		    
10   		    
7   		    
3   
   
Introduction: Good, interesting and discussing research problem in detail. A hypothesis may be presented separately or with the introduction section.   		    
5   		    
3   		    
1   
Literature review: 15 to 20 recent literature discussed.        
5 (If more than 15 literature review provided)   		    
3 (If   10 to 15 literature review provided)   		    
1 (If less than 10 literature review provided)   
   
Methods:   clear-cut mention of tools, theory, software, sampling, analysis tools, etc.    		    
5   		    
3   		    
1   
   
Results: are   presented clearly. All tables and images are properly cited in the text.    		    
5   		    
3   		    
1   
   
Conclusion: Present evidence to support the result analysis   by citing 7 to 10 works of earlier researchers.    		    
5 (if more than 7 supporting citations provided )   		 3 (If 7 to 5 supporting citations)       
1 (if less than 5 supporting citations)   
   
Limitations and Study Forward: The author should discuss the limitations of this study. And also   present future scope or plan of the study.   		    
5   		    
3   		    
1   
   
Co-authors Contribution: All co-authors should clearly mention their sizeable contribution to   the article. Simply saying all authors contribute equally will not be   accepted.    		    
5   		    
3   		    
1   

 

References: Minimum 30 good quality references required with CrossRef DOI. (at least 20 should have DOI)

       10 (If 30 or more)   

    
7 (between 30 to 20)   		 3 (less than 20)   
   
Total Marks   		    
100   		    
65   		    
25   

 

Decision Matrix

Score

Probability (%)

Recommendation

75-100

Most likely to be published

Refer to manuscript preparation guidelines and verify that your article is updated.

60-74

This manuscript may pass the first stage of review but in peer review, a minor revision will be required.

Refer to manuscript preparation guidelines and work on weaknesses.  

40-59

This manuscript may pass the first stage of review but in peer review, a major revision will be required or could be rejected by the reviewer

Refer to manuscript preparation guidelines and work on the weaknesses of each section. It will save your morale and time.

<40

Most likely to be rejected in the first stage

Refer to manuscript preparation guidelines and do an honest revision to satisfy the guidelines, work strictly on the weaknesses of each section. It will save your morale and time.

Disclaimer: Above discussion should be used for self-assessment. In no way, the result of this assessment guarantees the publication of the paper in the journal.