Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 25, 2020
Published
July 15, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 502 Download : 341

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to survey the residents’ attitudes on the impact of tourism on Maasai Mara National Reserve and to identify critical issues and tourism development concerns of the Maasai residents associated with the social, economic, and environmental sustainability of the Maasai Mara National Reserve.


Methodology: Data for this study was collected from June-October 2015. The participants were residents, 18 and older, from three group ranches. Data were collected using single-stage cluster sampling to identify three group ranches, Koyiaki, Olkinyei, and Siana, in the Maasai Mara region. A semi-structured, open-ended questionnaire was used for face-to-face and photo-elicitation interviews of 24 respondents. Data were subsequently analysed using the Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA) technique.


Main Findings: The study identified six overarching themes; conservation, cultural change, community development, employment, livestock, and small business. This study found that residents perceived tourism with mixed feelings, both negative and positive. More specifically, residents living closer to the tourism destination experienced direct and tangible benefits as compared to those who live far away.


Applications of this study: The results of this study are important for tourism planners, practitioners, and conservation managers in developing holistic strategies that promote sustainable tourism development in the Mara region of Kenya.


Novelty/Originality of this study: The success of the tourism industry depends on the involvement of the local people. Lack of cooperation of the local communities in tourism development projects could lead to anger and mistrust, influencing perceptions of tourism and its three basic areas of benefits and costs: social, environmental, and economic. This study, for the first time, attempted to describe the resident’s attitudes towards tourism development in the Mara, results which can be used to improve the participation of local residents to ensure sustainable tourism development in destinations.

Keywords

Maasai Maasai Mara National Reserve Kenya Tourism Residents’ Views

Article Details

License

Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. IJTHR is a Sherpa Romeo Journal. 

Publishing License

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of  Creative Commons License

How to Cite
Nampushi, J., & Nankaya, J. (2020). AN ASSESSMENT OF THE MAASAI RESIDENTS’ VIEWS ON TOURISM IN THE MAASAI MARA NATIONAL RESERVE, KENYA. International Journal of Tourism & Hospitality Reviews, 7(2), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijthr.2020.721
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. All Answers. (2018). Tourism Dissertation; The economic development of the host destinations. Accessed on June 2020.
  2. Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Knopf, R. C., & Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents‟ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 1056–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.03.001
  3. Ap, J. (1992). Perceptions of tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 19, 665-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(92)90060-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(92)90060-3
  4. Bhandari, Medani. (2014). Is Tourism Always Beneficial? A Case Study from Masai Mara National Reserve, Narok, Kenya. Pacific Journal of Science and Technology. 15(1):458–483 .
  5. Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020284
  6. Beresford, M., and Phillips, A. (2000). Protected landscapes: A conservation model for the 21st century. The George Wright Forum 17(1): 15–26.
  7. Burns, P., & Holden, A. (1995). Tourism: A new perspective. London: Prentice-Hall.
  8. Cooper, C., Fletcher, J., Fyall, A., Gibert, D., Wanhill, S. (2008). Tourism principles and practice. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
  9. Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, USA.
  10. Fredline, E., Faulkner, B. (2000). Enclave Tourism Development: For whom the benefits rolls? Annals of Tourism Research 27 (3), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00103-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00103-6
  11. Ameida, F., Balbuena, A., Cortes, R. (2015). Residents attitude towards the impacts of tourism. Tourism Perspectives 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2014.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2014.11.002
  12. Githiru, M., and Lens, L. (2007). Application of fragmentation research to conservation planning for multiple stakeholders: An example from the Taita Hills, Southeast Kenya. Biological Conservation 134(2): 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.016
  13. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  14. Glasson, J. (1994). Oxford; A heritage city under pressure. Tourism Management, 15, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(94)90007-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(94)90007-8
  15. Gursoy, D., Chen, J., and Yoon Y., (2000). Using structural equation modeling to assess the effects of tourism impact factors and local residents’ support for tourism development (pp. 243–250). In Annual Conference Proceedings of the Travel and Tourism Research Association.
  16. Gursoy, D., Jurowski, C., Uysal, M. (2002). Residents attitudes- A structural modeling approach. Annals of Tourism Research.29.79–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00028-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00028-7
  17. Hart, L.A., O’ Connell, C.E. (1998). Human conflict with African and Asian Elephants and associated conservation dilemmas. Center for Animal in Society in the School of veterinary medicine and Ecology Graduate group. University of California, Davis
  18. Healey, P. (1998). Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society. Town Planning Review, 69, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.69.1.h651u2327m86326p DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.69.1.h651u2327m86326p
  19. Homewood, K., Kristjanson, P., and Trench, P. C. (Eds.), (2009). Staying Maasai: Livelihoods, Conservation, and Development in East African Rangelands. Springer, New York.
  20. Honey, M. S. (2008). Ecotourism and sustainable development: Who owns paradise? Island Press, Washington, DC.
  21. Honey, M. S. (1999). Treading lightly? Ecotourism’s impact on the environment. Environment: Science and policy for Sustainable Development, 41(5), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139159909604631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139159909604631
  22. IUCN. (1990): Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its islands. Conservation, management, and sustainable use. Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No.6.-Gland, Switzerland.
  23. Jamal, T., and Stronza, A. (2009). Collaboration theory and tourism practice in protected areas: Stakeholders structuring and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17, 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741
  24. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2017).
  25. Kenya Tourism Board (2017). Tourism statistics 2017. Nairobi. www.ktb.go.ke
  26. Keogh, B. (1990). Public participation in community tourism planning. Annals of Tourism Research, 17, 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90009-G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90009-G
  27. Kiss, A. (2004). Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19(5), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.010
  28. Kiyiapi, J. (2005). A community business: Elerai ranch and conservation area, Kenya. AWF Working Paper. Nairobi: AWF.
  29. Mason, P., Cheyne, S. (2000). Resident’s attitudes to proposed tourism development. Annals of Tourism, 27, (2) 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00084-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00084-5
  30. Mwale, S. (2000). Changing relationships: The history and future of wildlife conservation in Kenya. Swara 22(4): 11-17.
  31. Mwangi, E.M. (1995). Land use planning and coordination study: Protected area system coverage. Final Report to the Kenya Wildlife Service, Nairobi.
  32. Ng, P., Ow, Y. (2017). The design process and analysis of an innovative umbrella. UK: Lambert Academic Publishing.
  33. Nunkoo, R., Gursoy, D. (2012). Residents’ support for tourism. An identity perspective. Annals of Tourism Research. 39. 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.05.006
  34. Nyhus, P. J., Tilson, R., and Sumianto (2000). Crop-raiding elephants and conservation implications at Way Kambas National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia. Oryx, 34(4), 262– 274. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3008.2000.00132.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3008.2000.00132.x
  35. Okello, M., and Kiringe, J. (2004). Threats to biodiversity and the implications in protected and adjacent dispersal areas of Kenya. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 12(1)55-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580408667224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580408667224
  36. Omondi, P, Wangila, B, and Ogbu, O. (2000). Investigating the Impact of Tourism in Kenya. International Research Center: Canada (www.idrc.org).
  37. Ondicho, T. (2005). Land alienation, land tenure, and tourism in Maasailand, Kenya. Mila 6: 64-72.
  38. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  39. Patton, M. (1999). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  40. Perdue, R., Long, P., and Allen, L. (1990). Resident support for tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 17, 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90029-Q DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90029-Q
  41. Pretty, J., and Smith, D. (2004). Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation biology, 18(3), 631-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00126.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00126.x
  42. Rakic, T., and Chambers, D. (2010). Innovative techniques in tourism research: An exploration of visual methods and academic filmmaking. International Journal of Tourism Research 12: 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.761
  43. Reid, R. J., Nkedianyea, D., Saida, M. Y., Kaeloa, D., Nesellea, Makuia, M., O., Onetua, L., Kiruswad, S., Ole Kamuaro, N., Kristjanson, P., Ogutu, J., BurnSilver, S. B., Goldman, M. J., Boone, R. B., Galvin, K. A., Dickson, N. M., and Clark, W. C.. (2009). Evolution of Models to Support Community and Policy Action with Science: Balancing Pastoral Livelihoods and Wildlife Conservation in Savannas of East Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (November 3, 2009): published online. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900313106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900313106
  44. Reid, D. G., Mair, H., and George, W. (2004). Community tourism planning: A self- assessment instrument. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.007
  45. Rice, P., and Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  46. Sinclair, A. and Norton-Griffiths, M. (1979). Serengeti: Dynamics of an ecosystem. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  47. Stem, C. J., Lassoie, J. P., Lee, D. R., and Deshler, D. D. (2003). How “eco†is ecotourism? A comparative case study of ecotourism in Costa Rica. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 11(4) 322-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580308667210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580308667210
  48. Um, S., & Crompton J. L. (1990). Attitude determinants in tourism destination choice. Annals of Tourism Research, 17, 432–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90008-F DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90008-F
  49. UNWTO (2017). United Nations World Tourism Organization. Tourism trends and Marketing. Madrid.
  50. UNWTO. (2018). United Nations World Tourism Organization. Tourism trends and Marketing. Madrid.
  51. UNWTO (2009). Indicators of sustainable development for tourism destinations.5th UNWTO International Conference on Tourism Statistics - Tourism: An Engine for Employment Creation, Bali, Indonesia.
  52. Wang, Y., Rompf, P., Severt, D., Peerapat Diet, N. (2006). Examining and identifying the determinants of travel expenditure patterns. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8 (5) 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.583
  53. Weaver, D. (2002). The evolving concept of ecotourism and its potential impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2002.003753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2002.003753
  54. Weaver, D., Lawton, L. (2006). Tourism management. John Wiley & Sons.
  55. Yoon, Y., Gursoy, D., and Chen, J. S. (2001). Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modeling. Tourism Management, 22(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00062-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00062-5
  56. Zimbardo, P.G., Boyd, J.N (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual difference metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6) 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271