Main Article Content

Abstract

The city and regions, which rely on their ecosystems, depends upon their health and availability. Changes to the usage pattern of these, as a process of urbanization, may bring economically positive impact but can be devastating for the ecology and social well-being of many groups of society. It is thus becoming increasingly important to measure these city resources in order to manage them effectively. The challenge is of appropriate land-use planning giving special consideration to natural systems which combines with the urban edges. This paper briefly analyses the green belt as a component of natural system and its role played in National Capital Region of a developing country (India) as an example. The attempt is made to identify the impacts due to changes in land-use planning on the green belt between two cities. Simultaneously, attention is drawn to the ways and situations, in which other functions can be incorporated within the green belts. These have helped to bring out potentials which can be considered for effective planning of green belt. The study is based on the evidence, case studies and it is suggested that appropriate planning may make green belts (GB) an effective planning tool but monitoring plays the most important role in their performance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mittal, M. (2015). IMPACT ANALYSIS OF LAND-COVER (GREENBELTS) CHANGE DUE TO CHANGES IN LAND-USE PLANNING. International Journal of Students’ Research in Technology & Management, 3(6), 386–388. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijsrtm.2015.361

References

  1. Alpkokin, P. et al., 2007. POLICIES, COMMUTING PATTERNS AND ACCESSIBILITY IN A NON MONOCENTRIC CITY: CASE STUDY OF DELHI. s.l., EASTS ICRA.
  2. Dale, V. H., 1997. The Relationship between land use change and climate change. Inferential Studies of Climate Change, August, 7(3), p. 753–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0753:TRBLUC]2.0.CO;2
  3. Frey, H., 2000. Not green belts but green wedges: the precarious relationship between city and country. Glasgow, 2000 Stockton Press, pp. 13-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000003
  4. George, M. S., Babu, P. R. & Khanna, P., 1999. Carrying capacity as a basis for sustainable development: A case study of National Capital Region in India. Progress in Planning, Volume 52 , pp. 101-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(99)00004-5
  5. Kächele, H. & Zander, P., 1999. Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development. Agricultural Systems, March , 59(3), p. 311–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00017-7
  6. Lambin, E. F. & Meyfroidt, P., 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization and the looming land scarcity. 1 March , 108(9), p. 3465–3472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
  7. Mohan, M., 2005. Urban Land Cover/Land Use Change Detection in National Capital Region (NCR) Delhi: A Study of Faridabad District. Pharaohs to Geoinformatics, April, pp. 16-21.
  8. Rahman, A., Netzband, M., Singh, A. & Mallick, J., 2009. An Assessment of Urban Environmental Issues Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques: An Integrated Approach. A Case Study: Delhi, India. In: Urban Population-Environment Dynamics in the Developing World: Case Studies and Lessons Learned. Paris: Committee for International Cooperation in National Research in Demography (CICRED), pp. 182-211.
  9. Whitby, M. & Willis, K., 1985. The Value of Green Belt Land. Journal of Rural Studies, 1(2), pp. 147-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(85)90067-1
  10. Wrbka, T., Wackernagelb, M. & Haberla, H., 2004. Land use and sustainability indicators. An introduction. Land Use Policy 21, 3 July, 21(3), p. 193–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.004