Main Article Content

Abstract

Planning, scheduling plays a vital role in improving the prospects of successful implementation of infrastructure projects. Project planning involves defining and coordinating activities and work tasks, preparing work schedules, assigning and allocating resources to competing activities and developing an acceptable budget. The scheduling is just one of the tools will be used to manage activities and duration.. The scope of this work is to Consistent view of project status and issues, is to ensure that the project is completed within the allocated and approved budget; Work Break Down structure will be prepared, duration and predecessors for each activity will be assigned, Critical Path will be determined, Resource analyzing and leveling will be done for entire,. Estimating is to assign resources to each activity in the activity list. Total duration and cost will come to know by using Microsoft Project. Based on prediction of future traffic at junction on chord road the grade separator is been projected. Accordingly the planning scheduling of grade separator at junction on chord road is been prepared. An effective planning, scheduling will help in emerging problems and taking time correctively action.

Keywords

Planning Scheduling Resource Activity Duration and Microsoft Project.

Article Details

How to Cite
R, S., & R, M. K. (2015). PLANNING SCHEDULING OF GRADE SEPARATOR. International Journal of Students’ Research in Technology & Management, 1(5), 555–578. Retrieved from https://mgesjournals.com/ijsrtm/article/view/98

References

  1. Aftab Hameed Memon and Rosli Mohammad Zin “Resource-Driven Scheduling
  2. Implementation in Malaysian Construction Industry†International Journal of Sustainable
  3. Construction Engineering & Technology, December 2010, Vol 1, No 2, PP 77-89.
  4. Aftab Hameed Memon, Ismail Abdul Rahman, Mohd Razaki Abdullah, Ade Asmi Abdu Azis
  5. “Factors Affecting Construction Cost in Mara Large Construction Project: Perspective of
  6. Project Management Consultant†International Journal of Sustainable Construction
  7. Engineering & Technology, December 2010, Vol 1, No 2 PP. 41-54.
  8. Benjamin, C., Babcock, D., Yunus, N., and Kincaid “Knowledge Based Prototype for
  9. Improving Scheduling Productivity†.J. Computing in Civil. Eng., 1990, Volume 4, issuse2,
  10. PP 124–134.
  11. Hassanein,and O.Moselhi,“Planning and Scheduling Highway Constructionâ€, Journal
  12. of construction Engineering and Management, VOL 130, No. 5, September/October 2004, pp.
  13. -646.
  14. John Conlin and Arkady Retik “ The Applicability of Project Management Software and
  15. Advanced IT Techniques in Construction Delays Mitigation†International Journal of
  16. Project Management 1997 Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 107-120.
  17. Khalied Hyari, Khaled El-Rayes and M.ASCE “Optimal Planning and Scheduling for
  18. Repetitive Construction Projects.â€Journal of management and Engineering, volume 22, Issue 1,
  19. January 2006 PP 11–19.
  20. Li, Heng and Chan, Neo and Guo, H.L. and Lu, Weisheng and Skitmore, Martin “Optimizing
  21. Construction Planning Schedules by Virtual Prototyping Enabled Resource Analysisâ€
  22. Automation in Construction, 2009 Volume18, issuse7, pp. 912-918.
  23. Murali Sambasivan, Yau Wen Soon "Causes and Effects of Delays in Malaysian Construction
  24. Industry", International Journal of Project Management 25 (2007) PP 517–526.
  25. Nguyen Duy Long, Stephen Ogunlana, Truong Quang, Ka Chi Lam, "Large Construction
  26. Projects in Developing Countries: a Case Study from Vietnam", International Journal of
  27. Project Management, Vol. 22, pp. 553–561
  28. Nabil A. Kartam and Raymond E. Levitt “A Least-Commitment Approach to Planning
  29. Construction Projects with Repeated Cycles of Operation†IAARC Vol 2, PP 189-196.
  30. Ricardo Mendes Jr and Luiz Fernando M. Heineck “Preplanning Method for Multi-Story
  31. Building Construction Using Line of Balance†Proceedings IGLC ’98
  32. Russell Kenley and Olli Seppänen Location-Based Management of Construction Projects: “Part
  33. of a New Typology for Project Scheduling Methodologies†Proceedings of the 2009 Winter
  34. Simulation Conference.