Issue
Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of 
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION: A CASE STUDY ON MALAYSIAN MILLENNIALS
Corresponding Author(s) : Kee-Man Chuah
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): May
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyse which gender language features are used by both genders in computer-mediated communication (CMC) and also investigates if online gender communication reflects normal face-to-face communication.
Methodology: A qualitative research design was employed in addressing the objectives of the study. A total of 260 Facebook comments were collected and analysed using more than one methodological approach in accordance with CMDA (Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis).
Main Findings: The findings show that male language features occurred more frequently compared to female language features. However, commenters of both genders do not always follow their respective gender language features. This shows that commenters from both genders do not necessarily follow their own gender stereotypes according to the different contextual situations they face.
Applications of this study: The findings from this study can contribute to gender language studies and also benefit those who are interested in millennial research and the usage of CMC in recent times.
Novelty/Originality of this study: In this research, common framework in analysing gender differences is improved to fit the needs of current CMC trends.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Computer-mediated Communication and Linguistic Landscapes. In Holmes, J. & Hazen, K. (Eds.), Research methods in sociolinguistics: a practical guide (pp. 74-90). Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
Basow, S. A., & Rubenfield, K. (2003). Troubles talk: Effects of gender and gender-typing. Sex Roles, 48(3-4), 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022411623948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022411623948
Bonvillian, N. (2000). Language, culture and communication. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Bond, B. J. (2009). He posted, she posted: gender differences in self-disclosure on social network sites. Rocky Mountain Communication Review, 6(2).
Cameron, R. (2010). Growing up and apart: Gender divergences in a Chicagoland elementary school. Language Variation and Change, 22(2), 279-319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000074
Chuah, K. M. (2013). Aplikasi media sosial dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris: Persepsi pelajar universiti. Issues in Language Studies, 2(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1680.2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1680.2013
Coates, J. (1993).Women, men and language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Coates, J. (2018). The rise and fall (and rise) of Mars and Venus in language and gender research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619644-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619644-1
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771
December, J. (1997). Notes on defining of computer-mediated communication. Computer Mediated Communication Magazine, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1997/jan/december.html
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2016). Population of Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.my
Dino, C., & Gustilo, L. (2015). Digitalk: An exploration of the linguistic features of CMC. International Journal of Languages, Literature, and Linguistics, 1(1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJLLL.2015.V1.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJLLL.2015.V1.11
Drakett, J., Rickett, B., Day, K., & Milnes, K. (2018). Old jokes, new media–Online sexism and constructions of gender in Internet memes. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517727560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517727560
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450-2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
Fromm, J. (2016, May). What you need to know about millennial travellers. Retrieved from http://www.millennialmarketing.com/2016/05/what-you-need-to-know-about-millennial-travelers/
Gibson, L. A., & Sodeman, W. A. (2014). Millennials and technology: Addressing the communication gap in education and practice. Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 63-75.
Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2007). Students’ linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2240-2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.004
Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., Okdie, B. M., Burk, N. M., & Ward, T. B. (2011). Even in virtual environments women shop and men build: A social role perspective on Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 304-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.008
Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from mars, women are from venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyber Psychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0151
Herring, S. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In Herring, S. C. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81-108). New York: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.08her DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.08her
Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in on-line communication. In Holmes, J. & Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202-228). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch9
Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In. Barab, S. A, Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
Herring, S. C., & Stoerger, S. (2014). 29 Gender and (A)nonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication. In Holmes, J.& Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 567-586). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch29
Holmes, J. (2001). An Introduction to sociolinguistics. England: Pearson Education.
Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of language and gender (Vol. 25). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Hwang, H. S. (2014). Gender differences in emoticon use on mobile text messaging: evidence from a Korean sample. International Journal of Journalism & Mass Communication, 1, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.15344/2349-2635/2014/107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15344/2349-2635/2014/107
Hwa, E. T. B., Lee, E. L. W., & Cheng, R. (2011). Generation y and choice of mobile service provider: A study on their purchasing decisions in choosing a mobile service provider. In 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research Proceeding.
Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5-6), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010937901821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010937901821
Lakoff, G. (1975). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Contemporary Research in philosophical logic and linguistic semantics (pp. 221-271). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1756-5_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1756-5_9
Locher, M. A. (2010) Introduction: politeness and impoliteness in computer mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 6. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001
Miller, L. J., & Lu, W. (2018, August 20). Gen Z is set to outnumber millennials within a year. Retrieved from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-20/gen-z-to-outnumber-millennials-within-a-year-demographic-trends
Morris, E. (2013).She likes it, He doesn't: Gender differences in Facebook communication Behaviors. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Ott, M. (2016). Tweet like a girl: A corpus analysis of gendered language in social media. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Pew Research Centre (2010, February 24) Millennials. Confident. Connected. Open to change. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/02/24/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change/
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2002). Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022811006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022811006
Savicki, V. (1996) Gender language style and group composition in Internet discussion groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00191.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00191.x
Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel, D., & Greenfield, P. (2006). Connecting developmental constructions to the Internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.395
Thomson, R., Murachver, T., & Green, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12, 171 - 175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00329
Walker, K.L. (2008). Women's Communication and Language. In Wolfgang, D. (Ed.), The international encyclopaedia of communication. NY: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecw007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecw007
