Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF POLITICS IN AMERICAN ENGLISH
Corresponding Author(s) : Nataliia Tatsenko
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): March
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The research is aimed at reconstructing a conceptual model of POLITICS as a social phenomenon that is activated by the word politics in the minds of American people.
Methodology: As an appropriate methodology, “the semantics of lingual networks†(SLN)is used to analyze a 1000-context sample of the word politics from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Specifically, a range of logical predicates (associated with POLITICS) is established and sorted by propositional schemas of basic frames. The latter is reproduced graphically in the network conceptual form and equated to the denotative meaning of POLITICS.
Main findings: The conducted research made it possible to define 26 propositional schemas that are regarded as the conceptual model of POLITICS in American English.
Novelty/originality: The research is the first attempt to study social phenomena via linguistic tools only – those of cognitive linguistics (the SLN methodology) and corpus linguistics (analysis of a COCA sample where these phenomena are represented) – rather than via techniques of politology, sociology, psychology and other social sciences themselves. Along with the conceptual model of POLITICS, the first-ever idea to convert it into the field cognitive model is offered as well (via operations of cognitive interpretation and prominence). As a result, the final model can be used to define what features of POLITICS are mentally the most relevant for the American community. The possibility of comparing several cognitive models of POLITICS is also stated.
Applications of the study: The research results can be used for politological, sociological and psychological studies; to compile new curricula for philology undergraduates and postgraduates.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Arendt, H. (1996). The origins of totalitarianism. TsentrKom. (Original work published 1951).
- Aristotle (2017). Politics. RIPOL Klassik. (Original work was written 335-322 BC). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882960-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882960-002
- Arutjunova, N. D., & Rjabceva, N. K. (Eds.) (1993). Logical analysis of the language. Mental operations. Nauka.
- Augustine of Hippo (1998). The City of God. ALETEIIA: UTSIMM-Press. (Original work published 427).
- Bacon, F. (1962). New Atlantis. Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1627).
- Baker, P. (2016). The shapes of collocation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.2.01bak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.2.01bak
- Baker, P., & Vessey, R. (2018). A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak
- Boldyrev, N. N. (2001). Concept and word meaning. In I. A. Sternin (Ed.), Methodology problems of cognitive linguistics (pp. 25-36). Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
- Bolognesi, M., & Aina, L. (2019). The similarity is closeness: using distributional semantic spaces to the model similarity in visual and linguistic metaphors. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 101-138. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0061
- Bondarenko, E. V. (2014). Matrix modeling. Time duality in the English-language world picture. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
- Bondarenko, E. V. (2017). World picture and matrix modeling as a basic method of its analysis. In I.S. Shevchenko (Ed.), How to draw a bird’s portrait: the methodology of the language cognitive-communicative analysis (pp. 59-105). V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
- Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
- Boulton, A. (2017). Corpora in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 50(4), 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000167
- Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: a new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139-173. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
- British National Corpus (BNC). https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc
- Calvin, J. (1998). Institutes of the Christian Religion. Izdatelstvo Rossiiskogo Gosudarstvennogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta. (Original work published 1541).
- Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate turning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02
- Campanella, T. (1954). The City of the Sun. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1602).
- Carey, S. (2000). The origin of concepts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_3
- Chen, M, & Flowerdew, J. (2018). A critical review of research and practice in data-driven learning (DDL) in the academic writing classroom. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16130.che DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16130.che
- Cicero (1966). De re publica. In S. L. Utschenko (Ed.), Dialogues (pp. 7-89). Nauka. (Original work was written 51 BC).
- Clausner, T., & Croft, W. (1999). Domain and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.001
- Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Brigham Young University. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
- Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864
- Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million-word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): design, architecture and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 159-190. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav
- Divjak, D., & Arppe, A. (2013). Extracting prototypes from exemplars. What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 221-274. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0008
- Dupont, M., & Zufferey, S. (2017). Methodological issues in the use of directional parallel corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 270-297. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.05dup DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.05dup
- Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Routledge.
- Fourier, C. (1939). New industrial and social world. Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo. (Original work published 1828).
- Franco, K., Geeraerts, D., Speelman, D., & Van Hout, R. (2019). Concept characteristics and variation in lexical diversity in two Dutch dialect areas. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(1), 205-242. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0136
- Fresco, J., & Meadows, R. (2007). Future by Design. Venus Project.
- Gilquin, G. (2015). The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 51-88. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0005
- Grotius, H. (1994).On the law of war and peace. Ladomir. (Original work published 1623).
- Harmash, O. L. (2012). Fractal structure of the concept system of the modern English language. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, 62, 45-50.
- Hobbes, T. (1936). Leviathan. Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo. (Original work published 1651).
- Holbach, P. H. (1963). Natural politics. In Kh. N. Momdzhian (Ed.), Selected works (volume 2) (pp. 85-537). Izdatelstvo sotsialno-ekonomicheskoi literatury. (Original work published 1770).
- Ji, M. (2018). A quantitative semantic analysis of Chinese environmental media discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0040
- Karasik, V. I., & Slyshkin, G. G. (2001). Linguocultural concept as a research unit. In I. A. Sternin (Ed.), Methodology problems of cognitive linguistics (pp. 75-80). Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
- Kolesov, V. V. (1992). Concept of culture: image, idea, symbol. Vestnik SPbGU, 3(16), 30-40.
- Krechetova, O. V. (2015). The cognitive-matrix analysis within researching rites. Baltijskij gumanitarnyj zhurnal, 4(13), 30-32.
- Kubrjakova, E. S. (1994). Initial stages of cognitivism foundation: linguistics – psychology – cognitive science. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 34-47.
- Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
- Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
- Lederer, J. (2016). Finding source domain triggers: how corpus methodologies to aid in the analysis of conceptual metaphor. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(4), 527-558. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.4.04led DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.4.04led
- Lihachev, D. S. (1993). Concept sphere of the Russian language. Izvestija RAN. Serija: literatura i jazyk, 52(1), 3-9.
- Ljapin, S. H. (1997). Conceptology: defining the approach. Koncepty. Nauchnye Trudy Centrkoncepta, 1, 11-35.
- Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government. In A. L. Subbotin (Ed.), Selected works (volume 3) (pp. 135-407). Mysl. (Original work published 1689). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810268
- Lüdeling, A., & Kytö, M. (Eds.) (2008). Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook (Volume 1). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211429
- Machiavelli, N. (1982). The Prince. In R. Khlodovskii (Ed.), Selected works (pp. 301-379). Khudozhestvennaia literatura. (Original work published 1513).
- Madsen, M. (2016). Cognitive metaphor theory and the metaphysics of immediacy. Cognitive Science, 40(4), 881-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12320
- Marat, J. P. (1956). Chains of Slavery. In V. P. Volgin, A. Z. Manfred (Eds.), Selected works (volume 1) (pp. 73-211). Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1774).
- Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1958). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Gospolitizdat. (Original work published 1848).
- McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: theory, method, practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395
- Montesquieu, C. L. (1999). The spirit of laws. Mysl. (Original work published 1748).
- More, T. (1953). Utopia. Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1516).
- Morelly, E. (1956). The code of nature. Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1755).
- Morozova, E. N. (2009). The matrix-network organization of the DAMAGE concept within value categorization. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija «Lingvistika», 4, 14-17.
- Morozova, O. (2017). Monomodal and multimodal instantiations of conceptual metaphors of Brexit. LEGE ARTIS. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 2(2), 250-283. https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0017
- Nikitin, M. V. (2007). The course of linguistic semantics (2nd ed.). Izdatelstvo RGPU imeni A. I. Gercena.
- O’Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.) (2010). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949
- Oster, U. (2010). Using a corpus methodology for semantic and pragmatic analysis: What can corpora tell us about the linguistic expression of emotions? Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 727-763. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.023
- Plato (2015). Republic. Akademicheskii proekt. (Original work was written 360 BC).
- Popova, Y., Yemelyanova, Y., & Prikhodko, N. (2014). A grammatical and lexical constituent of pre-election discourse. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 19(1), 48-51. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/33923/3/PopovaGrammatical2.pdf
- Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2007). Cognitive linguistics. AST: Vostok – Zapad.
- Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2001). Sketches on cognitive linguistics. Istoki.
- Prykhodko, A. M. (2008). The synergetic organization of the concept corpus. In A. M. Prykhodko (Ed.), Concepts and concept systems within the cognitive-discourse paradigm of linguistics (pp. 204-292). Premier.
- Rousseau, J. (1938). The Social Contract. Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo. (Original work published 1762).
- Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera Masegosa, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45
- Saint-Simon, H. (1948). Catéchisme des industriels. In V. P. Volgin (Ed.), Selected works (volume 2) (pp. 121-273). Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1823).
- Shcherbak, H. V. (2018). Attractor models of the concept EVALUATION in modern English discourse. Zakarpatski filolohichni studii, 2(4), 31-35. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/25074?locale=uk
- Skobnikova, O. (2018). Analyzing the FAMILY concept on the basis of American national corpora. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: «Linhvistyka», 32, 115-120.
- Spencer, H. (2007). The Man versus the State. Sotsium. (Original work published 1884).
- Spinoza, B. (2015). Theologico-Political Treatise. Akademicheskii proekt. (Original work published 1670).
- Starceva, N. N., & Saprun, I. R. (2017). The BUSINESSMAN concept in lingual networks (on the basis of the English language). Visnyk KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina. Inozemna filolohiia, 86, 95-102.
- Stepanov, J. S. (2004). Constants. The vocabulary of the Russian culture (3rd ed.). Akademicheskij proekt.
- Stepanov, V. N. (2016). Network conceptual model of force (“Kraftâ€) as a philosophical concept. Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 5, 279-287.
- Stepanov, V. V. (2019). Matrix model of the POLITICS concept (on the basis of English-language discourse). Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky, 175, 634-641. http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/72764
- Strelchenko, K. S. (2016). Conceptual space MYSTERY: the frame model (on the basis of English fiction). Studia Philologica, 6, 56-62.
- Tatsenko, N. V. (2018a). Empathy in the modern English discourse: cognitive-synergetic dimension. Doctoral thesis, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
- Tatsenko, N. V. (2018b). Grammatical parameters of the notional modus of the EMPATHY concept lexicalized in modern English discourse. Advanced Education, 9, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.107093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.107093
- Thomas Aquinas (2006). Summa Theologica. Volume 1 (Questions 1-64). Savin S. A. (Original work was written 1265-1274).
- Thomas Aquinas (2007). Summa Theologica. Volume 1 (Questions 65-119). Savin S. A. (Original work was written 1265-1274).
- Vaez Dalili, M., & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2013). A contrastive corpus-based analysis of the frequency of discourse markers in NE and NNE media discourse: implications for a “universal discourse competenceâ€. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0010
- Vorkachev, S. G. (2001). Linguoculturology, language individual, concept: the foundation of the anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics. Filologicheskie nauki, 1, 64-72. http://lincon.narod.ru/lingvocult.htm
- Weber, M. (1990). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. In Y. N. Davydov (Ed.), Selected works (pp. 61-273). Progress. (Original work published 1905).
- Yehorova, O., Prokopenko, A., & Popova, O. (2019). The concept of European integration in the EU-Ukraine perspective: notional and interpretative aspects of language expression. On-line Journal Modelling New Europe, 29, 53-77. https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2019.29.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2019.29.03
- Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2009). Concept / domain: the matrix and network models. Kul’tura narodov Prichernomor’ja, 1(168), 254-259.
- Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2013). Name as a text: a conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion). Kognicija, kommunikacija, diskurs, 6, 47-76.
References
Arendt, H. (1996). The origins of totalitarianism. TsentrKom. (Original work published 1951).
Aristotle (2017). Politics. RIPOL Klassik. (Original work was written 335-322 BC). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882960-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882960-002
Arutjunova, N. D., & Rjabceva, N. K. (Eds.) (1993). Logical analysis of the language. Mental operations. Nauka.
Augustine of Hippo (1998). The City of God. ALETEIIA: UTSIMM-Press. (Original work published 427).
Bacon, F. (1962). New Atlantis. Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1627).
Baker, P. (2016). The shapes of collocation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.2.01bak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.2.01bak
Baker, P., & Vessey, R. (2018). A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak
Boldyrev, N. N. (2001). Concept and word meaning. In I. A. Sternin (Ed.), Methodology problems of cognitive linguistics (pp. 25-36). Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
Bolognesi, M., & Aina, L. (2019). The similarity is closeness: using distributional semantic spaces to the model similarity in visual and linguistic metaphors. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 101-138. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0061
Bondarenko, E. V. (2014). Matrix modeling. Time duality in the English-language world picture. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
Bondarenko, E. V. (2017). World picture and matrix modeling as a basic method of its analysis. In I.S. Shevchenko (Ed.), How to draw a bird’s portrait: the methodology of the language cognitive-communicative analysis (pp. 59-105). V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
Boulton, A. (2017). Corpora in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 50(4), 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000167
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: a new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139-173. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
British National Corpus (BNC). https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc
Calvin, J. (1998). Institutes of the Christian Religion. Izdatelstvo Rossiiskogo Gosudarstvennogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta. (Original work published 1541).
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate turning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02
Campanella, T. (1954). The City of the Sun. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1602).
Carey, S. (2000). The origin of concepts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_3
Chen, M, & Flowerdew, J. (2018). A critical review of research and practice in data-driven learning (DDL) in the academic writing classroom. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16130.che DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16130.che
Cicero (1966). De re publica. In S. L. Utschenko (Ed.), Dialogues (pp. 7-89). Nauka. (Original work was written 51 BC).
Clausner, T., & Croft, W. (1999). Domain and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.001
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Brigham Young University. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864
Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million-word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): design, architecture and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 159-190. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav
Divjak, D., & Arppe, A. (2013). Extracting prototypes from exemplars. What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 221-274. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0008
Dupont, M., & Zufferey, S. (2017). Methodological issues in the use of directional parallel corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 270-297. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.05dup DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.05dup
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Routledge.
Fourier, C. (1939). New industrial and social world. Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo. (Original work published 1828).
Franco, K., Geeraerts, D., Speelman, D., & Van Hout, R. (2019). Concept characteristics and variation in lexical diversity in two Dutch dialect areas. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(1), 205-242. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0136
Fresco, J., & Meadows, R. (2007). Future by Design. Venus Project.
Gilquin, G. (2015). The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 51-88. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0005
Grotius, H. (1994).On the law of war and peace. Ladomir. (Original work published 1623).
Harmash, O. L. (2012). Fractal structure of the concept system of the modern English language. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, 62, 45-50.
Hobbes, T. (1936). Leviathan. Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo. (Original work published 1651).
Holbach, P. H. (1963). Natural politics. In Kh. N. Momdzhian (Ed.), Selected works (volume 2) (pp. 85-537). Izdatelstvo sotsialno-ekonomicheskoi literatury. (Original work published 1770).
Ji, M. (2018). A quantitative semantic analysis of Chinese environmental media discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0040
Karasik, V. I., & Slyshkin, G. G. (2001). Linguocultural concept as a research unit. In I. A. Sternin (Ed.), Methodology problems of cognitive linguistics (pp. 75-80). Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
Kolesov, V. V. (1992). Concept of culture: image, idea, symbol. Vestnik SPbGU, 3(16), 30-40.
Krechetova, O. V. (2015). The cognitive-matrix analysis within researching rites. Baltijskij gumanitarnyj zhurnal, 4(13), 30-32.
Kubrjakova, E. S. (1994). Initial stages of cognitivism foundation: linguistics – psychology – cognitive science. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 34-47.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
Lederer, J. (2016). Finding source domain triggers: how corpus methodologies to aid in the analysis of conceptual metaphor. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(4), 527-558. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.4.04led DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.4.04led
Lihachev, D. S. (1993). Concept sphere of the Russian language. Izvestija RAN. Serija: literatura i jazyk, 52(1), 3-9.
Ljapin, S. H. (1997). Conceptology: defining the approach. Koncepty. Nauchnye Trudy Centrkoncepta, 1, 11-35.
Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government. In A. L. Subbotin (Ed.), Selected works (volume 3) (pp. 135-407). Mysl. (Original work published 1689). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810268
Lüdeling, A., & Kytö, M. (Eds.) (2008). Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook (Volume 1). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211429
Machiavelli, N. (1982). The Prince. In R. Khlodovskii (Ed.), Selected works (pp. 301-379). Khudozhestvennaia literatura. (Original work published 1513).
Madsen, M. (2016). Cognitive metaphor theory and the metaphysics of immediacy. Cognitive Science, 40(4), 881-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12320
Marat, J. P. (1956). Chains of Slavery. In V. P. Volgin, A. Z. Manfred (Eds.), Selected works (volume 1) (pp. 73-211). Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1774).
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1958). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Gospolitizdat. (Original work published 1848).
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: theory, method, practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395
Montesquieu, C. L. (1999). The spirit of laws. Mysl. (Original work published 1748).
More, T. (1953). Utopia. Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1516).
Morelly, E. (1956). The code of nature. Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1755).
Morozova, E. N. (2009). The matrix-network organization of the DAMAGE concept within value categorization. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija «Lingvistika», 4, 14-17.
Morozova, O. (2017). Monomodal and multimodal instantiations of conceptual metaphors of Brexit. LEGE ARTIS. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 2(2), 250-283. https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0017
Nikitin, M. V. (2007). The course of linguistic semantics (2nd ed.). Izdatelstvo RGPU imeni A. I. Gercena.
O’Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.) (2010). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949
Oster, U. (2010). Using a corpus methodology for semantic and pragmatic analysis: What can corpora tell us about the linguistic expression of emotions? Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 727-763. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.023
Plato (2015). Republic. Akademicheskii proekt. (Original work was written 360 BC).
Popova, Y., Yemelyanova, Y., & Prikhodko, N. (2014). A grammatical and lexical constituent of pre-election discourse. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 19(1), 48-51. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/33923/3/PopovaGrammatical2.pdf
Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2007). Cognitive linguistics. AST: Vostok – Zapad.
Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2001). Sketches on cognitive linguistics. Istoki.
Prykhodko, A. M. (2008). The synergetic organization of the concept corpus. In A. M. Prykhodko (Ed.), Concepts and concept systems within the cognitive-discourse paradigm of linguistics (pp. 204-292). Premier.
Rousseau, J. (1938). The Social Contract. Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo. (Original work published 1762).
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera Masegosa, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45
Saint-Simon, H. (1948). Catéchisme des industriels. In V. P. Volgin (Ed.), Selected works (volume 2) (pp. 121-273). Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (Original work published 1823).
Shcherbak, H. V. (2018). Attractor models of the concept EVALUATION in modern English discourse. Zakarpatski filolohichni studii, 2(4), 31-35. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/25074?locale=uk
Skobnikova, O. (2018). Analyzing the FAMILY concept on the basis of American national corpora. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: «Linhvistyka», 32, 115-120.
Spencer, H. (2007). The Man versus the State. Sotsium. (Original work published 1884).
Spinoza, B. (2015). Theologico-Political Treatise. Akademicheskii proekt. (Original work published 1670).
Starceva, N. N., & Saprun, I. R. (2017). The BUSINESSMAN concept in lingual networks (on the basis of the English language). Visnyk KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina. Inozemna filolohiia, 86, 95-102.
Stepanov, J. S. (2004). Constants. The vocabulary of the Russian culture (3rd ed.). Akademicheskij proekt.
Stepanov, V. N. (2016). Network conceptual model of force (“Kraftâ€) as a philosophical concept. Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 5, 279-287.
Stepanov, V. V. (2019). Matrix model of the POLITICS concept (on the basis of English-language discourse). Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky, 175, 634-641. http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/72764
Strelchenko, K. S. (2016). Conceptual space MYSTERY: the frame model (on the basis of English fiction). Studia Philologica, 6, 56-62.
Tatsenko, N. V. (2018a). Empathy in the modern English discourse: cognitive-synergetic dimension. Doctoral thesis, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Tatsenko, N. V. (2018b). Grammatical parameters of the notional modus of the EMPATHY concept lexicalized in modern English discourse. Advanced Education, 9, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.107093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.107093
Thomas Aquinas (2006). Summa Theologica. Volume 1 (Questions 1-64). Savin S. A. (Original work was written 1265-1274).
Thomas Aquinas (2007). Summa Theologica. Volume 1 (Questions 65-119). Savin S. A. (Original work was written 1265-1274).
Vaez Dalili, M., & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2013). A contrastive corpus-based analysis of the frequency of discourse markers in NE and NNE media discourse: implications for a “universal discourse competenceâ€. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0010
Vorkachev, S. G. (2001). Linguoculturology, language individual, concept: the foundation of the anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics. Filologicheskie nauki, 1, 64-72. http://lincon.narod.ru/lingvocult.htm
Weber, M. (1990). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. In Y. N. Davydov (Ed.), Selected works (pp. 61-273). Progress. (Original work published 1905).
Yehorova, O., Prokopenko, A., & Popova, O. (2019). The concept of European integration in the EU-Ukraine perspective: notional and interpretative aspects of language expression. On-line Journal Modelling New Europe, 29, 53-77. https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2019.29.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2019.29.03
Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2009). Concept / domain: the matrix and network models. Kul’tura narodov Prichernomor’ja, 1(168), 254-259.
Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2013). Name as a text: a conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion). Kognicija, kommunikacija, diskurs, 6, 47-76.