Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
GUIDED INQUIRY: HOW TO IMPROVE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY STUDENT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Corresponding Author(s) : Haryanto
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020): July
Abstract
Purpose of the study: Students’ scientific literacy skills are very much needed in 21st-century learning, but the fact is that field gains in scientific literacy are still low. Research with a focus on improving the ability of students’ scientific literacy to use an inquiry-based approach is also limited. Therefore, this quantitative quasi-experimental study aims to improve students’ scientific literacy skills by using the inquiry model.
Methodology: Using quantitative designs in quasi-experimental designs. By using 42 secondary students obtained based on purposive sampling. The experimental group used the guided inquiry model, while the control group used the traditional learning model. Then the data are analyzed to get descriptive and inferential results.
Main Findings: There is a significant difference in terms of students’ scientific literacy skills between the control class and the experimental class. It was found that using the guided inquiry model found differences with the t-test value of 19,373 on students’ scientific literacy abilities. It can be underlined that the guided inquiry model has a significant effect on students’ scientific literacy skills compared to traditional learning models.
Applications of this study: In this research can be a consideration for teachers to apply guided inquiry to improve students’ scientific literacy skills.
Novelty/Originality of this study: In this study, the renewal of learning that uses the guided inquiry learning model can improve the scientific literacy abilities of students.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Abidin, Y., Tita M., dan Hana Y. (2017). Literacy Learning. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
- Aktekin, N. C. (2019). Critical Friends Group (CFG): Inquiry-Based Professional Development Model for Turkish EFL Teachers. Eurasian Journal Educational Research. 81, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.81.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.81.1
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Asrial., Syahrial., Kurniawan, D. A., Chan, F., Septianingsih, R., Perdana, R. (2019). Multimedia Innovation 4.0 in Education: E-Modul Ethnoconstrucivism. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 7(10), 2098-2107. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071007
- Asrial, Syahrial, Kurniawan, D. A, Chan, F., Nugroho, P., Pratama, R. A., Septiasari, R. (2019). Identification: The Effect of Mathematical Competence On Pedagogic Competency Of Prospective Teacher. Humanities & Social Science Reviews (HSSR). 7(4), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7413
- Astalini., Kurniawan, D. A., Sulistiyo, U., Perdana, R., Susbiyanto, S. (2019). E-Assessment Motivation in Physics Subjects for Senior High School. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE). 15(9), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i11.10843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i11.10843
- Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., Darmaji, Sholihah, L. R., Perdana, R. (2019).Characteristics Of Students’ Attitude To Physics In Muaro Jambi High School. Humanities & Social Science Reviews (HSSR), 7(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7210
- Astalini., D. A. Kurniawan., Darmaji., M. Ikhlas., Kuswanto., R. Perdana., L. Anggraini., & I. Putra. (2020). Attitude and Self-confidence Students in Learning Natural Sciences: Rural and Urban Junior High School. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 8(6), 2569-2577. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080640
- Atkins P.W. (2005). Skeletal chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 42, 20-25.
- Biggs, J. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Budiarti, R. S., Harlis., Natalia, D. (2020). High Oder Thinking Skills for Biology Education: Applied Microbiology Learning Videos Based on Jambi Local Wisdom. Universal Journal of Education Research, 8(2), 689-694. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080242
- Bybee, R., & McCree, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
- Cindy, R. G., & Clarck, A. C. (2006). Scaffolding and Achievment in Problem Based and Inquiry Learning: A Reponse to Krischner, Sweller and Clarck. Journal of Education Psychologist. 42(2).
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods In Education: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
- Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
- Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research. New York: Pearson
- DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
- Demirel, M., & Caymaz, B. (2015). Prospective Science and Primary School Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs in Scientific Literacy, Procedia – Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 191, 1903-1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500
- Durant, J. R. (1993). What is scientific literacy? In J. R. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), science and culture in Europe (pp. 129– 137). London: Science Museum.
- El Islami, R. A. Z, Nahadi, dan Anna P, (2016), Building Student Science Literacy on the Concept of Acid Bases Through Guided Inquiry Learning, Research Journals and Science Learning, 2(2): 110-120
- Ernavita, dan Tine M. K. (2016). Konsep dan Penerapan Kimia SMA/MA Kelas XI. Kelompok Peminatan Mipa, Jakarta: PT. Bumi aksara.
- Gurses, A., Gunes, K., Barin, T. B., Eroglu, Z., & Cozel, F. S. (2015). Relation Between Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Science Literacy Levels And Their Some Scientific Process Skills. Procedia – Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 197. 2395-2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.300
- González, M. G., & DÃaz, T, V. G. (2015). Guided Inquiry and Project-Based Learning in the field of specialised translation: a description of two learning experiences, Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 23(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948018
- Hackling, M.W, Goodrum, D. & Rennie, L. (2001). “The state of science in Australian secondary schoolsâ€. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 7(4), 6-17.
- Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Retrieved from http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf
- Holman J. (2002). What does it mean to be chemically literate? Education in Chemistry, 39, 12-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203019771-4
- Jenkins, E. W. (1994). Scientific literacy. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite, (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Volume 9, 2nd ed., pp. 5345– 5350). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
- Kerlinger, F. N. (2014). Foundations of behavioral research. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada
- Kjaersli, M., & Lie, S. (2004). PISA and scientific literacy: similarities and differences between the nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830410001695736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830410001695736
- Kremer, K., Specht, C., Urhahne, D., & Mayer Jurgen. (2014). The relationship in biology between the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Biological Education. 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.788541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.788541
- Kuhlthau, C. C. (2010). Guided inquiry: School libraries in the 21st century. School Libraries Worldwide, 16(1), 17–28.
- Kurniawan, D. A., Asrial., Syahrial., Salsabila, W. S., Kurniawati, E. F., Anandari, Q. S., Perdana. R., Lumbantoruan, A., Nasih, N., Samosir, S. C., & Dewi, U. P. (2019). Etnoscience Investigation in Pimary Schools: Impact on Science Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 7(12), 2789-2795. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071229
- Maison, Darmaji, Astalini, Dwi Agus Kurniawan, Peni Sefiah Indrawati. (2019). Science Process Skills And Motivation. Humanities & Social Science Reviews (HSSR), 7(5), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756
- Maison., Astalini., Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., Anggraini, L. (2019). The Phenomenon of Physicology Senior High School Education: Relationship of Students’ Attitudes towards Physics, Learning Style, Motivation. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 7(10), 2199-2207. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071018
- Maison., Ernawati, M. D. W., Budiarti, R. S., Kurniawan, W., Ningsih, Y., Puspitasari, T. O., Jannah, N., & Putra, D. S. (2019). Learning in Nature Science: Social Implication, Normality of Scientist., Attitudes Towards Investigation of Natural Science, and Interest Adds To Science Learning Time. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(12), 1478-1484.
- Maison., Darmaji., Astalini., Kurniawan, D. A., Sumaryanti., & Perdana, R. (2020). Supporting Assessment in Education: E-Assessment Interest in Physics. Universal Journal of Education Research, 8(1) 89-97. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080110
- Millar, R. (2006). “Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school scienceâ€. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499- 1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
- Ministry of National Education, 2003. Law Number 20 Year 2003, Concerning the National Education System, Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
- Millar,R. & Osborne, J. (1998). Science Education for the Future, Report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation. London, UK: King’s College.
- Mundy, C., & Potgieter, M. (2019). Refining Process-oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Chemistry Students in an Academic Development Programme. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1622223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1622223
- National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- OECD. (2016), PISA 2015 Result: Excellence and Equity in Education, OECD Publishing. Paris-France.
- Rambuda, A. M., & Fraser, W. J., (2004). “Perceptions of teachers of the application of science process skills in the teaching of Geography in secondary schools in the Free State provinceâ€, South African Journal of Education Copyright, 24(1) 10–17.
- Shwartz Y., Ben-Zvi R. & Hofstein A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of ‘chemical literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266191
- Soltis, R., Verlinden, N., Kruger, N., Carroll, A., & Trumbo, T. (2015). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning strategy enhances students’ higher level thinking skills in a pharmaceutical sciences course. The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79111
- Syahrial., Asrial., Husni, S., Arsil. (2020). Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Independence of Students in Thematic Learning. Universal Journal of Education Research. 8(1), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080120
- Techakosit, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Connectivism learning environment in augmented reality science laboratory to enhance scientific literacy. Procedia – Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 174. 2108-2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.009
- Tornee, N., Bunterm, T., Lee, K., & Muchimapura, S. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of guided inquiry with problem-solving process and cognitive function training in a high school chemistry course, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1597722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1597722
- Treagust, D.F., Qureshi, S.S., Venkat, R.V., Ojeil, J., Mocerino, M., & Southam, D.C. (2018). Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) as a Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: A perspective from Grade 10 Chemistry class. Research in Science Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0
- Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
- Xu, H., & Talanquer, V. (2013). Effect of the level of inquiry on student interactions in chemistry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(1), 29 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3002946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3002946
- Yalcin, S. A., Acisli, S., & Turgut, U. (2011). Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy. Procedia Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 15. 783-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.185
- Wongwatkit, G., Panjaburee, P. and Srisawasdi, N. (2017). ‘A proposal to develop a guided-inquiry mobile learning with a mastery learning mechanism for improving students’ learning performance and attitudes in Physics’, Int J. Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080898
- World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology. http:// www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
- Zheng, L., Li, X., Tian, L. and Cui, P. (2018). ‘The effectiveness of integrating mobile devices with inquiry-based learning on students’ learning achievements: a meta-analysis’, Int. J. Mobile Learning and Organisation, 12(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2018.089238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2018.089238
References
Abidin, Y., Tita M., dan Hana Y. (2017). Literacy Learning. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Aktekin, N. C. (2019). Critical Friends Group (CFG): Inquiry-Based Professional Development Model for Turkish EFL Teachers. Eurasian Journal Educational Research. 81, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.81.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.81.1
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Asrial., Syahrial., Kurniawan, D. A., Chan, F., Septianingsih, R., Perdana, R. (2019). Multimedia Innovation 4.0 in Education: E-Modul Ethnoconstrucivism. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 7(10), 2098-2107. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071007
Asrial, Syahrial, Kurniawan, D. A, Chan, F., Nugroho, P., Pratama, R. A., Septiasari, R. (2019). Identification: The Effect of Mathematical Competence On Pedagogic Competency Of Prospective Teacher. Humanities & Social Science Reviews (HSSR). 7(4), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7413
Astalini., Kurniawan, D. A., Sulistiyo, U., Perdana, R., Susbiyanto, S. (2019). E-Assessment Motivation in Physics Subjects for Senior High School. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE). 15(9), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i11.10843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i11.10843
Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., Darmaji, Sholihah, L. R., Perdana, R. (2019).Characteristics Of Students’ Attitude To Physics In Muaro Jambi High School. Humanities & Social Science Reviews (HSSR), 7(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7210
Astalini., D. A. Kurniawan., Darmaji., M. Ikhlas., Kuswanto., R. Perdana., L. Anggraini., & I. Putra. (2020). Attitude and Self-confidence Students in Learning Natural Sciences: Rural and Urban Junior High School. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 8(6), 2569-2577. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080640
Atkins P.W. (2005). Skeletal chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 42, 20-25.
Biggs, J. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Budiarti, R. S., Harlis., Natalia, D. (2020). High Oder Thinking Skills for Biology Education: Applied Microbiology Learning Videos Based on Jambi Local Wisdom. Universal Journal of Education Research, 8(2), 689-694. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080242
Bybee, R., & McCree, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
Cindy, R. G., & Clarck, A. C. (2006). Scaffolding and Achievment in Problem Based and Inquiry Learning: A Reponse to Krischner, Sweller and Clarck. Journal of Education Psychologist. 42(2).
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods In Education: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research. New York: Pearson
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
Demirel, M., & Caymaz, B. (2015). Prospective Science and Primary School Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs in Scientific Literacy, Procedia – Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 191, 1903-1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500
Durant, J. R. (1993). What is scientific literacy? In J. R. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), science and culture in Europe (pp. 129– 137). London: Science Museum.
El Islami, R. A. Z, Nahadi, dan Anna P, (2016), Building Student Science Literacy on the Concept of Acid Bases Through Guided Inquiry Learning, Research Journals and Science Learning, 2(2): 110-120
Ernavita, dan Tine M. K. (2016). Konsep dan Penerapan Kimia SMA/MA Kelas XI. Kelompok Peminatan Mipa, Jakarta: PT. Bumi aksara.
Gurses, A., Gunes, K., Barin, T. B., Eroglu, Z., & Cozel, F. S. (2015). Relation Between Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Science Literacy Levels And Their Some Scientific Process Skills. Procedia – Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 197. 2395-2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.300
González, M. G., & DÃaz, T, V. G. (2015). Guided Inquiry and Project-Based Learning in the field of specialised translation: a description of two learning experiences, Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 23(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948018
Hackling, M.W, Goodrum, D. & Rennie, L. (2001). “The state of science in Australian secondary schoolsâ€. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 7(4), 6-17.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Retrieved from http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf
Holman J. (2002). What does it mean to be chemically literate? Education in Chemistry, 39, 12-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203019771-4
Jenkins, E. W. (1994). Scientific literacy. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite, (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Volume 9, 2nd ed., pp. 5345– 5350). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Kerlinger, F. N. (2014). Foundations of behavioral research. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada
Kjaersli, M., & Lie, S. (2004). PISA and scientific literacy: similarities and differences between the nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830410001695736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830410001695736
Kremer, K., Specht, C., Urhahne, D., & Mayer Jurgen. (2014). The relationship in biology between the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Biological Education. 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.788541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.788541
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2010). Guided inquiry: School libraries in the 21st century. School Libraries Worldwide, 16(1), 17–28.
Kurniawan, D. A., Asrial., Syahrial., Salsabila, W. S., Kurniawati, E. F., Anandari, Q. S., Perdana. R., Lumbantoruan, A., Nasih, N., Samosir, S. C., & Dewi, U. P. (2019). Etnoscience Investigation in Pimary Schools: Impact on Science Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 7(12), 2789-2795. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071229
Maison, Darmaji, Astalini, Dwi Agus Kurniawan, Peni Sefiah Indrawati. (2019). Science Process Skills And Motivation. Humanities & Social Science Reviews (HSSR), 7(5), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756
Maison., Astalini., Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., Anggraini, L. (2019). The Phenomenon of Physicology Senior High School Education: Relationship of Students’ Attitudes towards Physics, Learning Style, Motivation. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 7(10), 2199-2207. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071018
Maison., Ernawati, M. D. W., Budiarti, R. S., Kurniawan, W., Ningsih, Y., Puspitasari, T. O., Jannah, N., & Putra, D. S. (2019). Learning in Nature Science: Social Implication, Normality of Scientist., Attitudes Towards Investigation of Natural Science, and Interest Adds To Science Learning Time. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(12), 1478-1484.
Maison., Darmaji., Astalini., Kurniawan, D. A., Sumaryanti., & Perdana, R. (2020). Supporting Assessment in Education: E-Assessment Interest in Physics. Universal Journal of Education Research, 8(1) 89-97. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080110
Millar, R. (2006). “Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school scienceâ€. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499- 1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
Ministry of National Education, 2003. Law Number 20 Year 2003, Concerning the National Education System, Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Millar,R. & Osborne, J. (1998). Science Education for the Future, Report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation. London, UK: King’s College.
Mundy, C., & Potgieter, M. (2019). Refining Process-oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Chemistry Students in an Academic Development Programme. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1622223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1622223
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OECD. (2016), PISA 2015 Result: Excellence and Equity in Education, OECD Publishing. Paris-France.
Rambuda, A. M., & Fraser, W. J., (2004). “Perceptions of teachers of the application of science process skills in the teaching of Geography in secondary schools in the Free State provinceâ€, South African Journal of Education Copyright, 24(1) 10–17.
Shwartz Y., Ben-Zvi R. & Hofstein A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of ‘chemical literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266191
Soltis, R., Verlinden, N., Kruger, N., Carroll, A., & Trumbo, T. (2015). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning strategy enhances students’ higher level thinking skills in a pharmaceutical sciences course. The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79111
Syahrial., Asrial., Husni, S., Arsil. (2020). Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Independence of Students in Thematic Learning. Universal Journal of Education Research. 8(1), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080120
Techakosit, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Connectivism learning environment in augmented reality science laboratory to enhance scientific literacy. Procedia – Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 174. 2108-2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.009
Tornee, N., Bunterm, T., Lee, K., & Muchimapura, S. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of guided inquiry with problem-solving process and cognitive function training in a high school chemistry course, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1597722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1597722
Treagust, D.F., Qureshi, S.S., Venkat, R.V., Ojeil, J., Mocerino, M., & Southam, D.C. (2018). Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) as a Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: A perspective from Grade 10 Chemistry class. Research in Science Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0
Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
Xu, H., & Talanquer, V. (2013). Effect of the level of inquiry on student interactions in chemistry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(1), 29 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3002946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3002946
Yalcin, S. A., Acisli, S., & Turgut, U. (2011). Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy. Procedia Social and Behaviorial Sciences, 15. 783-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.185
Wongwatkit, G., Panjaburee, P. and Srisawasdi, N. (2017). ‘A proposal to develop a guided-inquiry mobile learning with a mastery learning mechanism for improving students’ learning performance and attitudes in Physics’, Int J. Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080898
World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology. http:// www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
Zheng, L., Li, X., Tian, L. and Cui, P. (2018). ‘The effectiveness of integrating mobile devices with inquiry-based learning on students’ learning achievements: a meta-analysis’, Int. J. Mobile Learning and Organisation, 12(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2018.089238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2018.089238