Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS AS EVALUATION MATERIALS FOR EQUATING EDUCATION QUALITY IN INDONESIA
Corresponding Author(s) : Widowati Pusporini
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Education Special Issue
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This research was compiled to analyze the improvement of the quality of education in Indonesia. The purpose of program evaluation is to know for sure whether the achievement of the results, progress, and obstacles encountered in the implementation of the program. Recognizing the low competency of school principals of the principal's partnership programs.
Methodology: The type of this research is development, research which aims to produce instruments to evaluate a school principal partnership program. The development design in this study using the Plomp model. The data was analyzed qualitatively as input for improvement of activities in 2018. The following data was collected using questionnaires, interviews, and observations.
Main Findings: The data and analysis show that the partnership program has recorded various advances made in the impact schools — both those related to curriculum management and implementation of supervision of learning and strengthening of school ecosystems. The effectiveness of school programs is very dependent on the carrying capacity of each school. However, it is the real result of this program is the change in mindset not only for principals but for almost all stakeholders.
Applications of this study: This Study is analyzed based on the school principal partnership program report to become recommendation and references for another partnership programs, improving the competency of school principals, and developing remote area (3T regions/frontier, outermost, and disadvantaged in Indonesia national scale) of Indonesia.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The findings imply that the partnership program has a significant impact on the equity growth in remote areas.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Alkin-Sahin, S., Tunca, N., & Kezer, F. (2015). Evaluation of an In-Service Training Program Developed about Measurement and Evaluation. Journal of Education and Future(8), 27.
- Alkin, M. C. (2011). Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. New York, USA: Guilford Press.
- Armstrong, D. (1995). Power and partnership in education: Parents, children and special educational needs: Routledge London.
- Banoglu, K. (2011). School principals' technology leadership competency and technology coordinatorship. Educational Sciences-Theory and Practice, 11(1), 208-213.
- Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesian education: Teachers, schools, and central bureaucracy: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203959015
- Chapman, C., Lowden, K., Chestnutt, H., Hall, S., McKinney, S., Hulme, M., & Friel, N. (2015). The school improvement partnership programme: using collaboration and enquity to tackle educational inequity. Scotland: Robert Owen Centre for Educational Change.
- Chenari, A., Sohrabimanesh, M., & Heydari, S. (2016). Studying the effect of in-service training on the empowerment of school principals (case study: public high school principals in Tehran). Journal of Current Research In Science, 735-742.
- Crosby, P. B. (1992). Completeness: Quality for the 21st century. USA: Penguin Books.
- Eddins, B., Kirk, J., et al. (2013). Utilization of 360-degree feedback in program assessment: Data support for the improvement of principal preparation. Paper presented at the National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal.
- Fullan, M. G. (2008). What's Worth Fighting for in the Principalship? New York: Teacher College Press.
- Gülşen, C. G., G. B. (2014). The principal and a healthy school climate. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.0.S93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.0.S93
- Jones, L. (2009). The Importance of School Culture for Instructional Leadership. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 4(4), n4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071384
- Kamil, H. (2004). The growth of community-based library services to support education in Indonesia. Information Development, 20(2), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666904045321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666904045321
- Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Pedoman program studi banding kepemimpinan kepala sekolah pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Dirjen GTK. Jakarta.
- Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Panduan perencanaan pendampingan kemitraan kepala sekolah. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
- Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan Pendampingan Kepala Sekolah Mitra Dan Fasilitator Program Kemitraan Kepala Sekolah Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
- Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Panduan Program Pertukaran Kepala Sekolah Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
- Penugasan Guru Sebagai Kepala Sekolah, 6 C.F.R. (2018).
- Kompri. (2015). Manajemen Sekolah: Orientasi Kemandirian Kepala Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
- Leahy, M., Davis, N., Lewin, C., Charania, A., Nordin, H., Orlic, D., Lopez-Fernadez, O. (2016). Smart partnerships to increase equity in education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 84.
- Mackinnon, J. (2004). Academic supervision: Seeking metaphors and models for quality. Journal of Further and Higher education, 28(4), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000298876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000298876
- Marks, H. M., & Nance, J. P. (2007). Contexts of accountability under systemic reform: Implications for principal influence on instruction and supervision. Educational administration quarterly, 43(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06291414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06291414
- Plomp&Nieveen. (2007). An Introduction to educational design research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seminar Conducted at the East China Normal University [Z]. Shanghai: SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
- Pusporini, W., Setiawan, A., & Ikrarini, E. O. (2019). Increasing Educational Equity through the Principals' Partnership Program in Talaud Island. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2165-2170. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071014
- Range, B. G., Scherz, S., et al. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5
- Reardon, K. M. (2000). An experiential approach to creating an effective community-university partnership: The East St. Louis Action Research Project. Cityscape, 59-74.
- Sciarappa, K. M., Y. C. (2014). National principal mentoring: does it achieve its purpose? International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3, 20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2012-0080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2012-0080
- Shulha, e. a. (2010). The program evaluation standards: a guide for evaluators and evaluation users: Sage.
- Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2006). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (Vol. 49): Springer Science & Business Media.
- Suriansyah, A. (2015). Strategi kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, guru, orang tua, dan masyarakat dalam membentuk karakter siswa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4828
- Van den Akker, J., Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2012). Design approaches and tools in education and training: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
References
Alkin-Sahin, S., Tunca, N., & Kezer, F. (2015). Evaluation of an In-Service Training Program Developed about Measurement and Evaluation. Journal of Education and Future(8), 27.
Alkin, M. C. (2011). Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. New York, USA: Guilford Press.
Armstrong, D. (1995). Power and partnership in education: Parents, children and special educational needs: Routledge London.
Banoglu, K. (2011). School principals' technology leadership competency and technology coordinatorship. Educational Sciences-Theory and Practice, 11(1), 208-213.
Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesian education: Teachers, schools, and central bureaucracy: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203959015
Chapman, C., Lowden, K., Chestnutt, H., Hall, S., McKinney, S., Hulme, M., & Friel, N. (2015). The school improvement partnership programme: using collaboration and enquity to tackle educational inequity. Scotland: Robert Owen Centre for Educational Change.
Chenari, A., Sohrabimanesh, M., & Heydari, S. (2016). Studying the effect of in-service training on the empowerment of school principals (case study: public high school principals in Tehran). Journal of Current Research In Science, 735-742.
Crosby, P. B. (1992). Completeness: Quality for the 21st century. USA: Penguin Books.
Eddins, B., Kirk, J., et al. (2013). Utilization of 360-degree feedback in program assessment: Data support for the improvement of principal preparation. Paper presented at the National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal.
Fullan, M. G. (2008). What's Worth Fighting for in the Principalship? New York: Teacher College Press.
Gülşen, C. G., G. B. (2014). The principal and a healthy school climate. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.0.S93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.0.S93
Jones, L. (2009). The Importance of School Culture for Instructional Leadership. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 4(4), n4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071384
Kamil, H. (2004). The growth of community-based library services to support education in Indonesia. Information Development, 20(2), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666904045321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666904045321
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Pedoman program studi banding kepemimpinan kepala sekolah pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Dirjen GTK. Jakarta.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Panduan perencanaan pendampingan kemitraan kepala sekolah. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan Pendampingan Kepala Sekolah Mitra Dan Fasilitator Program Kemitraan Kepala Sekolah Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Panduan Program Pertukaran Kepala Sekolah Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan Pendidikan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Penugasan Guru Sebagai Kepala Sekolah, 6 C.F.R. (2018).
Kompri. (2015). Manajemen Sekolah: Orientasi Kemandirian Kepala Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Leahy, M., Davis, N., Lewin, C., Charania, A., Nordin, H., Orlic, D., Lopez-Fernadez, O. (2016). Smart partnerships to increase equity in education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 84.
Mackinnon, J. (2004). Academic supervision: Seeking metaphors and models for quality. Journal of Further and Higher education, 28(4), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000298876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000298876
Marks, H. M., & Nance, J. P. (2007). Contexts of accountability under systemic reform: Implications for principal influence on instruction and supervision. Educational administration quarterly, 43(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06291414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06291414
Plomp&Nieveen. (2007). An Introduction to educational design research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seminar Conducted at the East China Normal University [Z]. Shanghai: SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Pusporini, W., Setiawan, A., & Ikrarini, E. O. (2019). Increasing Educational Equity through the Principals' Partnership Program in Talaud Island. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2165-2170. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071014
Range, B. G., Scherz, S., et al. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5
Reardon, K. M. (2000). An experiential approach to creating an effective community-university partnership: The East St. Louis Action Research Project. Cityscape, 59-74.
Sciarappa, K. M., Y. C. (2014). National principal mentoring: does it achieve its purpose? International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3, 20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2012-0080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2012-0080
Shulha, e. a. (2010). The program evaluation standards: a guide for evaluators and evaluation users: Sage.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2006). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (Vol. 49): Springer Science & Business Media.
Suriansyah, A. (2015). Strategi kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, guru, orang tua, dan masyarakat dalam membentuk karakter siswa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4828
Van den Akker, J., Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2012). Design approaches and tools in education and training: Kluwer Academic Publisher.