Issue
Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
DESIGNING ENGLISH TRANSLATION TOWARDS INDONESIAN MODERATE RELIGIOUS BASED SCHOOL
Corresponding Author(s) : Mohammad Iskandar Dzulkurnain
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): May
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The purpose of this research is to unearth English teaching, delivering and translating the holy book of instructional design in Pesantren Budi Utomo (PBU) which is the Indonesian moderate religious-based school of East Java, Indonesia in terms of kind of syllabus, learning objectives, materials instruction, evaluation, teaching designs, vigor and its debility of instructional design in English teaching.
Methodology: It is qualitative research with ethnographic design. The data conducted in this research are the intended activities in the teaching-learning process, informants, and essential documents relied on the teaching-learning process. The data is collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. The collected data are analyzed through data reduction, categorization of data, and synthesis and arrange work hypothesis.
Main Findings: The syllabus that applies as a reference for preparing lesson plans is based on the National Curriculum and the Pesantren (religious-based school) Curriculum. The learning objective includes general learning and specific learning purpose. The learning objective of English learning at PBU is in line with English for Specific Purposes (ESP). The application of curriculum is 50% for the religious-based school curriculum and 50% for the government curriculum. There are many instructional teaching materials such as print, audio, and visual and non-printed. Class activities are another sketch to make students spend their full attraction and attention. Evaluations are conducted periodically.
Applications of this study: The syllabus produced from this study is used by the religion-based Islamic school at the secondary level. It has a function to become a bridge for language learning to ease the students for English acquisition.
Novelty/Originality of this study: Some similar researches were done to find out more about translation but it has not found yet research that focused on creating a syllabus to facilitate the student in learning the holy book of Islam through translation.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Ampa, A.T. & Rasyid, M.A. (2013). The Implementation of Multimedia Learning Materials in Teaching English Speaking Skills. International Journal of English Language Education, 1(3), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v1i3.4153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v1i3.4153
- Amuseghan, S. A. (2007). ESL Curriculum in Secondary Schools in Nigeria: Issues and Challenges towards Communicative Competence. Nebula, 4(2), 319-333.
- Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., and Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
- Brown, J. D. (1996). The Elements of Language Curriculum; A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
- Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of language learning & teaching. (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
- BSNP. (2006). Teknik Penyusunan Silabus. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
- Chiriac, E.H. & Frykedal, K.F. (2011). Management of Group Work as a Classroom Activity. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p3
- Cresswel, J. W. (1998). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogjakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar.
- Cunngingsworth. A. (1984). Evaluating and Selecting English Foreign Language Teaching Material. New York: MacMilan.
- Fatchan, A. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Pendekatan Etnografi dan Etnometodologi untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
- Harden, R.M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference? Medical Teacher, 24(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159022020687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159022020687
- Hidaya, M. (2007). The Teaching of English at Pondok Pesantren Attarbiyah Al Religioniyyah at Paiton Ponorogo. Unpublished Thesis. The State Religious University of Malang.
- Kennedy, D. Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2006). Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: a Practical Guide. In the Bologna Handbook. Accessed Online: http://www.bologna.msmt.cz/files/learning-outcomes.pdf.(Accessed on 7 December 2019)
- Kiraz, Hardal, Akdag & Guzel. (2004). Designing an Instruction or Using a Designed Instruction: Critiquing the Teachers' Instructional Design Approach. Quality in Education in the Balkan Countries Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria.
- Kırkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and Student Perception of Studying in an English-medium University. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 101-123.
- Lado, R., Baldwin, B. & Lobo, F. (1967). Massive vocabulary expansion in a foreign language beyond the basic course: the effects of stimuli, timing, and order of presentation. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.: 5-1095.
- Mahdi, R.N., et.al. (2013). A critical review of recent trends in second language syllabus design and curriculum development. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2),63-82. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.152
- Mahmud, B. (2017). Teacher Solution to Solve the Problem in Implementing the Activities Used in Teaching Speaking English in Religious Boarding School Darussalam Gontor. The 2nd TEYLIN International Conference Proceedings,81-88. Kudus, Indonesia. ISBN:978-602-1180-45-7.
- Moleong, L.J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
- Murtono. (2014). Konsep Manqul dalam Perspektif Lembaga Dakwah Religion Indonesia (LDII). Publication Script. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
- Nugraheni, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Bidang Pendidikan Bahasa. Solo: Cakrabooks.
- Nunan, D. (1998). Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Richards, J.C, and Rodger, T. (2001). Approaches and Method in Language Teaching. Australia: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
- Richards, J.C, and Rodger, T. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220
- Sabbah, S.S. (2018). English Language Syllabuses: Definition, Types, Design, and Selection. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(2), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.9
- Sadler, D.R. (1989).Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science,18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
- Savery, J.R. & Duffy, T.M. (1996). Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. NJ: Educational Technology Publications Englewood Cliffs.
- Setiawan, H.R.N & Anasy, M.M. (2008). After New Paradigm Catatan Para Ulama Tentang LDII (Lembaga Dakwah Religion Indonesia). Jakarta: Pusat Studi Religion Madani Institut.
- Simon, B. & Taylor, J. (2009) What is the value of course-specific learning goals? Journal of College Science Teaching. Nov/Dec: 53-57.
- Stanny, C.J. (2016). Reevaluating Bloom's Taxonomy: What Measurable Verbs Can and Cannot Say about Student Learning. Education Sciences, 6(37), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040037
- Sudjana, N. (2002). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Tarsito.
- Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: PT. Alfabeta.
- Ur, P. (2006). A Course in Language Teaching. Practice and Theory. UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Warschauer, M. (2000). The Changing Global Economy and the Future of English Teaching. TESOL QUARTERLY, 34(3), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587741
- Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
References
Ampa, A.T. & Rasyid, M.A. (2013). The Implementation of Multimedia Learning Materials in Teaching English Speaking Skills. International Journal of English Language Education, 1(3), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v1i3.4153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v1i3.4153
Amuseghan, S. A. (2007). ESL Curriculum in Secondary Schools in Nigeria: Issues and Challenges towards Communicative Competence. Nebula, 4(2), 319-333.
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., and Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Brown, J. D. (1996). The Elements of Language Curriculum; A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of language learning & teaching. (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
BSNP. (2006). Teknik Penyusunan Silabus. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Chiriac, E.H. & Frykedal, K.F. (2011). Management of Group Work as a Classroom Activity. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p3
Cresswel, J. W. (1998). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogjakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar.
Cunngingsworth. A. (1984). Evaluating and Selecting English Foreign Language Teaching Material. New York: MacMilan.
Fatchan, A. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Pendekatan Etnografi dan Etnometodologi untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Harden, R.M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference? Medical Teacher, 24(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159022020687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159022020687
Hidaya, M. (2007). The Teaching of English at Pondok Pesantren Attarbiyah Al Religioniyyah at Paiton Ponorogo. Unpublished Thesis. The State Religious University of Malang.
Kennedy, D. Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2006). Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: a Practical Guide. In the Bologna Handbook. Accessed Online: http://www.bologna.msmt.cz/files/learning-outcomes.pdf.(Accessed on 7 December 2019)
Kiraz, Hardal, Akdag & Guzel. (2004). Designing an Instruction or Using a Designed Instruction: Critiquing the Teachers' Instructional Design Approach. Quality in Education in the Balkan Countries Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and Student Perception of Studying in an English-medium University. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 101-123.
Lado, R., Baldwin, B. & Lobo, F. (1967). Massive vocabulary expansion in a foreign language beyond the basic course: the effects of stimuli, timing, and order of presentation. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.: 5-1095.
Mahdi, R.N., et.al. (2013). A critical review of recent trends in second language syllabus design and curriculum development. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2),63-82. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.152
Mahmud, B. (2017). Teacher Solution to Solve the Problem in Implementing the Activities Used in Teaching Speaking English in Religious Boarding School Darussalam Gontor. The 2nd TEYLIN International Conference Proceedings,81-88. Kudus, Indonesia. ISBN:978-602-1180-45-7.
Moleong, L.J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Murtono. (2014). Konsep Manqul dalam Perspektif Lembaga Dakwah Religion Indonesia (LDII). Publication Script. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Nugraheni, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Bidang Pendidikan Bahasa. Solo: Cakrabooks.
Nunan, D. (1998). Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J.C, and Rodger, T. (2001). Approaches and Method in Language Teaching. Australia: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Richards, J.C, and Rodger, T. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220
Sabbah, S.S. (2018). English Language Syllabuses: Definition, Types, Design, and Selection. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(2), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.9
Sadler, D.R. (1989).Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science,18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Savery, J.R. & Duffy, T.M. (1996). Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. NJ: Educational Technology Publications Englewood Cliffs.
Setiawan, H.R.N & Anasy, M.M. (2008). After New Paradigm Catatan Para Ulama Tentang LDII (Lembaga Dakwah Religion Indonesia). Jakarta: Pusat Studi Religion Madani Institut.
Simon, B. & Taylor, J. (2009) What is the value of course-specific learning goals? Journal of College Science Teaching. Nov/Dec: 53-57.
Stanny, C.J. (2016). Reevaluating Bloom's Taxonomy: What Measurable Verbs Can and Cannot Say about Student Learning. Education Sciences, 6(37), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040037
Sudjana, N. (2002). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: PT. Alfabeta.
Ur, P. (2006). A Course in Language Teaching. Practice and Theory. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2000). The Changing Global Economy and the Future of English Teaching. TESOL QUARTERLY, 34(3), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587741
Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.