Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
JUDGING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING: THE IDEA OF CONCEPT-BASED CURRICULUM
Corresponding Author(s) : Khadija Farhan Alhumaid
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 5 (2020): September
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to identify the method of applying the Concept-Based Curriculum, and to explain the strategies and requirements for its application by educators and teachers.
Methodology: Review and comparison different method that have been mentioned in the previous researches.
Results: The study deduces that focusing on the breadth of learning, as opposed to the depth, is vital in ensuring that knowledge is effectively organized for easier transferability into other contexts.
Applications of this study: The results of this study may help instructors to determine the range of potential benefits of using Concept-Based Curriculum to improve teaching and learning processes.
Novelty of the study: seeking for more information which is needed for educational researchers’ experiences of developing and using concept-based curricula to evaluate efficacy and usability.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Ahmad, I., & Ahmad, S. (2019). The Mediation Effect of Strategic Planning on The Relationship Between Business Skills and Firm’s Performance: Evidence from Medium Enterprises in Punjab, Pakistan. Opcion, 35(24), 746-778.
- Ahmad, I., Sahar. (2019). Waste Management Analysis From Economic Environment Sustainability Perspective. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research 8(12), 1540-1543.
- Ahmad, I., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Multiple Skills and Medium Enterprises’ Performance in Punjab Pakistan: A Pilot Study. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 7(4), 44-49.
- Cash, R. M. (2017). Advancing differentiation: Thinking and learning for the 21st century. Free Spirit Publishing.
- Erickson, H. (2012). Concept-based teaching and learning, International Baccalaureate Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Erickson, H. L., & Lanning, L. A. (2013). Transitioning to concept-based curriculum and instruction: How to bring content and process together. Corwin Press.
- Erickson, H. L., Lanning, L. A., & French, R. (2017). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355382
- Erickson, H. Lynn. (2016). Concept-based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond the facts. Corwin Press.
- Erickson, H. Lynn. (2018). Stirring the head, heart, and soul: Redefining curriculum, instruction, and concept-based learning. Corwin Press.
- Hardin, P. K., & Richardson, S. J. (2012). Teaching the concept curricula: Theory and method. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(3), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120127-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120127-01
- Isecke, H. (2017). Backward Planning: Building Enduring Understanding through Instructional Design. 9th ed. Vol. 32. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
- Jensen, R. A., and Kiley, T. (2015). Teaching, leading and learning in Pre K-8 settings: Strategies for success. Houghton Mifflin College Division.
- Killen, Roy. (2016). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice. Cengage Learning Australia.
- Lanning, Lois A. 2015. Designing a concept-based curriculum for English language arts: meeting the common core with intellectual integrity, k–12. Corwin Press.
- Lewis, L. S. (2016). Outcomes of a concept-based curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(2), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.002
- McTighe, Jay. (2017). Schooling by design: Mission, action, and achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- National Research Council. (2017). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. National Academies Press.
- Nottingham, James, and Bosse, Larsson. (2018). Challenging mindset: why a growth mindset makes a difference in learning–and what to do when it doesn’t. Corwin Press.
- Rogers, B. (2018). The Big Ideas in Physics and How to Teach Them: Teaching Physics 11–18. Routledge.
- Rose-Duckworth, R., and Ramer, K. (2019). Fostering learner independence: An essential guide for K-6 educators. Corwin Press.
- Stern, J., Ferraro, K., & Mohnkern, J. (2017). Tools for teaching conceptual understanding, secondary: Designing lessons and assessments for deep learning. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355689
- Tileston, D. (2015). What every teacher should know about effective teaching strategies. Corwin Press.
- Tomlinson, C., and McTighe, J. (2016). Integrating differentiated instruction & understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. ASCD.
- Wathall, J. (2016). Concept-Based Mathematics Teaching for Deep Understanding in Secondary Classrooms. Corwin Press.
- Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2016). the understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.
References
Ahmad, I., & Ahmad, S. (2019). The Mediation Effect of Strategic Planning on The Relationship Between Business Skills and Firm’s Performance: Evidence from Medium Enterprises in Punjab, Pakistan. Opcion, 35(24), 746-778.
Ahmad, I., Sahar. (2019). Waste Management Analysis From Economic Environment Sustainability Perspective. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research 8(12), 1540-1543.
Ahmad, I., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Multiple Skills and Medium Enterprises’ Performance in Punjab Pakistan: A Pilot Study. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 7(4), 44-49.
Cash, R. M. (2017). Advancing differentiation: Thinking and learning for the 21st century. Free Spirit Publishing.
Erickson, H. (2012). Concept-based teaching and learning, International Baccalaureate Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Erickson, H. L., & Lanning, L. A. (2013). Transitioning to concept-based curriculum and instruction: How to bring content and process together. Corwin Press.
Erickson, H. L., Lanning, L. A., & French, R. (2017). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355382
Erickson, H. Lynn. (2016). Concept-based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond the facts. Corwin Press.
Erickson, H. Lynn. (2018). Stirring the head, heart, and soul: Redefining curriculum, instruction, and concept-based learning. Corwin Press.
Hardin, P. K., & Richardson, S. J. (2012). Teaching the concept curricula: Theory and method. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(3), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120127-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120127-01
Isecke, H. (2017). Backward Planning: Building Enduring Understanding through Instructional Design. 9th ed. Vol. 32. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
Jensen, R. A., and Kiley, T. (2015). Teaching, leading and learning in Pre K-8 settings: Strategies for success. Houghton Mifflin College Division.
Killen, Roy. (2016). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice. Cengage Learning Australia.
Lanning, Lois A. 2015. Designing a concept-based curriculum for English language arts: meeting the common core with intellectual integrity, k–12. Corwin Press.
Lewis, L. S. (2016). Outcomes of a concept-based curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(2), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.002
McTighe, Jay. (2017). Schooling by design: Mission, action, and achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
National Research Council. (2017). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. National Academies Press.
Nottingham, James, and Bosse, Larsson. (2018). Challenging mindset: why a growth mindset makes a difference in learning–and what to do when it doesn’t. Corwin Press.
Rogers, B. (2018). The Big Ideas in Physics and How to Teach Them: Teaching Physics 11–18. Routledge.
Rose-Duckworth, R., and Ramer, K. (2019). Fostering learner independence: An essential guide for K-6 educators. Corwin Press.
Stern, J., Ferraro, K., & Mohnkern, J. (2017). Tools for teaching conceptual understanding, secondary: Designing lessons and assessments for deep learning. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506355689
Tileston, D. (2015). What every teacher should know about effective teaching strategies. Corwin Press.
Tomlinson, C., and McTighe, J. (2016). Integrating differentiated instruction & understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. ASCD.
Wathall, J. (2016). Concept-Based Mathematics Teaching for Deep Understanding in Secondary Classrooms. Corwin Press.
Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2016). the understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.