
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
Impact of technological change on security
Corresponding Author(s) : Magdalena Molendowska
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): March
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The object of the analysis is to assess the impact of technological change on security in both socio-economic and military contexts. The essence of the research is to show opportunities and threats resulting from the use of new technologies in the public (political, economic, social) and military space.
Methodology: The article was prepared based on critical analysis of literature and documents and uncontrolled observation method.
Main findings: When analyzing the use and impact of new technologies in the area of security, the following key questions arise: Could new technologies create problems for arms control? Could a new weapon or its use trigger an arms race? Could new technologies cause problems for people and the environment? In fact, technological change can have both positive and negative effects on security. Above all, it is important to realize that not using new technology is just as dangerous as using it. This applies to the development of economy, civilization and social progress. In the military area, it seems most dangerous to entrust control of nuclear arsenals to computer systems endowed with the ability to make decisions on their own.
Application of the study: Security forecasting based on the major variables emerging in today’s security environment.
Original/Novelty of the study: The subject matter is very current, we all participate in the identified problem. The use of new technology, on the one hand, helps make security more effective, but on the other, strikes fear and unease. The emerging fear of the rapid development and sophistication of artificial intelligence appear to be on a collision course with historical models of human uniqueness and individuality.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
Altmann, J. (2020). New Military Technologies: Dangers for International Security and Peace, w: Security & Peace / Sicherheit und Frieden, Nr 1, ss. 36. https://doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2020-1-36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2020-1-36
Bhide, J. S. (2021). Hypersonic Weapons: Strategic Drivers and Policy Proposals, w: Space & Defense, Nr 2, ss. 75-95.
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), AI Cybersecurity Challenges. Threat Landscape for Artificial Intelligence, (December 2020), ss. 74.
Gołębiowski, G. (2017). Powszechny dochód podstawowy – argumenty za i przeciw, w: Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, nr 334, ss. 33-45.
Grenda, B. (2019). Środowisko bezpieczeństwa europejskiego w świetle zagrożeń militarnych ze strony Rosji, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, ss. 540.
Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 lekcji na XXI wiek, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, ss. 456.
Jabłońska, M. R., Pólkowski, Z. (2017). Artificial Intelligence-Based Processes in Smes, w: Studies & Proceedings of Polish Association for Knowledge Management, Nr 86, ss. 13.
Kaku, M. (2000). Wizje, czyli jak nauka zmieni świat w XXI wieku, Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka, ss. 544.
Kaku, M. (2018). Przyszłość ludzkości, Warszawa: Prószyński Media, ss. 432.
Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady Europejskiej, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów w sprawie strategii UE w zakresie unii bezpieczeństwa (24.07.2020), Bruksela COM(2020) 605 final, ss. 34.
Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów, Kształtowanie cyfrowej przyszłości Europy (19.02.2020), Bruksela COM(2020) 67 final, ss. 18.
Kozub, M., Mitręga, A. (2018). Podstawy strategii bezpieczeństwa, Kielce: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jana Kochanowskiego, ss. 313.
Lindstrom, G. (2020). Four futures for CSDP, w: Fiott, D. (red.) THE CSDP in 2020. The EU’s legacy and ambition in security and defence, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, ss. 157.
McClure, A. (2005). Lincoln’s own yarns and stories, 1901, w: For the People: A Newsletter of the Abraham Lincoln Association, Nr 3, ss. 1-2.
Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, w: Electronics, Nr 8, ss. 1-6.
Oelrich, L. (2020). Cool your jets: Some perspective on the hyping of hypersonic weapons, w: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Nr 1, ss. 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1701283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1701283
Varghese, S. (2017). Bots on the ground. Can the rise of “killer robots” be halted?, w: New Statesman, Nr 25-31 August, ss. 18-27.
Wilkening, D. (2019). Hypersonic Weapons and Strategic Stability, w: Survival, Nr 5, ss. 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1662125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1662125
5G Systems Are Critical for the Use of Hypersonic Weapons. (2021), w: Military & Aerospace Fiber Optics, Nr 7, ss. 1-3.