Issue
Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
Publishing License
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
DEVELOPING MOBILE APPLICATIONS TO HELP HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TO CHOOSE COLLEGE MAJORS
Corresponding Author(s) : Mohamad Thohir
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): May
Abstract
Purpose of Study: The research aims to produce a mobile-based system for decision making to choose majors for high school students.
Methodology: This type of research is development research using the Lee & Owens model and is validated by media experts and counseling teachers.
Main findings: This research resulted in a mobile application that combines three types of psychological tests, namely multiple intelligence, Riasec, and personality types, to facilitate students in determining their majors. The application has been validated by media experts and counseling guidance teachers.
Application of this study: The resulting mobile application can be used by counseling guidance teachers in grade XII high schools who are still having difficulty in determining college majors. Product trials were conducted at Wachid Hasjim High School Class XII with a research sample of 40 people.
Novelty/originality of this study: This application can speed up decision making and can be used to determine college majors.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Ambiel, R. A. M., Hauck-Filho, N., Barros, L. de O., Martins, G. H., Abrahams, L., & De Fruyt, F. (2018). 18REST: A short RIASEC-interest measure for large-scale educational and vocational assessment. Psicologia: Reflexão e CrÃtica, 31(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-018-0086-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-018-0086-z
- Arikunto, S. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
- Carter, P. (2009). The Complete Book of Intelligence Tests: 500 Exercises to Improve, Upgrade and Enhance Your Mind Strength (1 edition). Capstone.
- De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and Holland’s RIASEC interest types. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00004-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00004-4
- Deporter, B., & Hernacki, M. (1992). Quantum Learning: Unleashing the Genius in You (1 edition). Dell.
- Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T. N., Blankenburg, J. S., Peters, H., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Interest in science: A RIASEC-based analysis of students’ interests. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337
- Fatmasari, F., & Supriyatna, A. (2019). Pemilihan dan Pengembangan Karier Berdasarkan Minat, Bakat dan Kepribadian Remaja Menggunakan Forward Chaining. JUITA : Jurnal Informatika, 7(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v7i1.4128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v7i1.4128
- Fridayanti, F., Uriawan, W., & Atmadja, A. R. (2018). Development of Android-Based Software to Support The Selection of University Majors that Fits with Student Personality Type. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 3(3), 203. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v3i3.628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v3i3.628
- Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Educational Research: An Introduction (8 edition). Pearson.
- Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (3 edition). Basic Books.
- Gardner, H. E. (2006). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice (Reprint edition). Basic Books.
- Gupta, S., Tracey, T. J. G., & Gore, P. A. (2008). Structural examination of RIASEC scales in high school students: Variation across ethnicity and method. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.013
- Hidajat, S. T. (2016). INTEREST SCALES FOR VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT OF SMKN 3 BENGKULU CITY. TRIADIK, 15(2). https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/triadik/article/view/2868
- Höffler, T. N., Köhler, C., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Scientists of the future: An analysis of talented students’ interests. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0184-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0184-1
- Kumaidi, K., Farida, R., & Haq, A. H. B. (2017). Skala Minat Kejuruan: Strategi Mengenali Minat Vokasi Siswa. URECOL, 553–562.
- Kurniawan, Y. I. (2017). Pelatihan Aplikasi Pengukuran Minat Kejuruan Siswa Bagi Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Se-Jawa Tengah. Warta LPM, 19(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.23917/warta.v19i2.2224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/warta.v19i2.2224
- Maftoon, P., & Sarem, S. N. (2012). The Realization of Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory in Second Language Acquisition (SLA). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(6), 1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1233-1241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1233-1241
- Meireles, E., & Primi, R. (2015). Validity and Reliability Evidence for Assessing Holland’s Career Types. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 25(62), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201504
- Murphy, A., Farley, H., Dyson, L. E., & Jones, H. (Eds.). (2017). Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Harnessing Trends and Challenging Orthodoxies. Springer Singapore. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811049439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6
- Nauta, M. M. (2012). Are RIASEC Interests Traits? Evidence Based on Self–Other Agreement. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(4), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712448895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712448895
- Nurlina, A. (2018). PEMAHAMAN PEMILIHAN PEMINATAN AKADEMIK PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X SMAN 5 TANGERANG TAHUN 2017-2018. Jurnal Penelitian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/jpbk.v3i1.3195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jpbk.v3i1.3195
- Setiawan, A. S., & Alimah, S. (2019). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN VISUAL AUDITORY KINESTHETIC (VAK) TERHADAP KEAKTIFAN SISWA. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.7284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.7284
- Siregar, R. (2018). Teaching model of visualisation, auditory and kinesthetic (VAK) to improve the economic education achievement. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 4(1), 06–10.
- Sodowsky, G. R., Taffe, R. C., Gutkin, T. B., & Wise, S. L. (1994). Development of the Multicultural Counseling Inventory: A self-report measure of multicultural competencies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.2.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.2.137
- Süerdem, A., & Erkök, B. (2016). Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter version of RIASEC in Turkish. SHS Web of Conferences, 26, 01063. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601063
- Taconis, R., & Kessels, U. (2009). How Choosing Science depends on Students’ Individual Fit to ‘Science Culture.’ International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802050876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802050876
- Vardarlı, B., Özyürek, R., Wilkins-Yel, K. G., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2017). Examining the structure of vocational interests in Turkey in the context of the personal globe model. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9338-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9338-6
- Walsh, W. B., Savickas, M. L., & Hartung, P. (2013). Handbook of Vocational Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203143209
- Wetzel, E., & Hell, B. (2014). Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models in Vocational Interest Measurement: An Illustration Using the AIST-R. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(4), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913508244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913508244
- Wiyono, B. D., & Kholidya, C. F. (2018). The Development of Academic Self-Management Inventory of Vocational High School Students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2018). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2018), Surbaya, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.164
References
Ambiel, R. A. M., Hauck-Filho, N., Barros, L. de O., Martins, G. H., Abrahams, L., & De Fruyt, F. (2018). 18REST: A short RIASEC-interest measure for large-scale educational and vocational assessment. Psicologia: Reflexão e CrÃtica, 31(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-018-0086-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-018-0086-z
Arikunto, S. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Carter, P. (2009). The Complete Book of Intelligence Tests: 500 Exercises to Improve, Upgrade and Enhance Your Mind Strength (1 edition). Capstone.
De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and Holland’s RIASEC interest types. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00004-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00004-4
Deporter, B., & Hernacki, M. (1992). Quantum Learning: Unleashing the Genius in You (1 edition). Dell.
Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T. N., Blankenburg, J. S., Peters, H., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Interest in science: A RIASEC-based analysis of students’ interests. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337
Fatmasari, F., & Supriyatna, A. (2019). Pemilihan dan Pengembangan Karier Berdasarkan Minat, Bakat dan Kepribadian Remaja Menggunakan Forward Chaining. JUITA : Jurnal Informatika, 7(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v7i1.4128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v7i1.4128
Fridayanti, F., Uriawan, W., & Atmadja, A. R. (2018). Development of Android-Based Software to Support The Selection of University Majors that Fits with Student Personality Type. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 3(3), 203. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v3i3.628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v3i3.628
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Educational Research: An Introduction (8 edition). Pearson.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (3 edition). Basic Books.
Gardner, H. E. (2006). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice (Reprint edition). Basic Books.
Gupta, S., Tracey, T. J. G., & Gore, P. A. (2008). Structural examination of RIASEC scales in high school students: Variation across ethnicity and method. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.013
Hidajat, S. T. (2016). INTEREST SCALES FOR VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT OF SMKN 3 BENGKULU CITY. TRIADIK, 15(2). https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/triadik/article/view/2868
Höffler, T. N., Köhler, C., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Scientists of the future: An analysis of talented students’ interests. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0184-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0184-1
Kumaidi, K., Farida, R., & Haq, A. H. B. (2017). Skala Minat Kejuruan: Strategi Mengenali Minat Vokasi Siswa. URECOL, 553–562.
Kurniawan, Y. I. (2017). Pelatihan Aplikasi Pengukuran Minat Kejuruan Siswa Bagi Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Se-Jawa Tengah. Warta LPM, 19(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.23917/warta.v19i2.2224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/warta.v19i2.2224
Maftoon, P., & Sarem, S. N. (2012). The Realization of Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory in Second Language Acquisition (SLA). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(6), 1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1233-1241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1233-1241
Meireles, E., & Primi, R. (2015). Validity and Reliability Evidence for Assessing Holland’s Career Types. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 25(62), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201504
Murphy, A., Farley, H., Dyson, L. E., & Jones, H. (Eds.). (2017). Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Harnessing Trends and Challenging Orthodoxies. Springer Singapore. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811049439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6
Nauta, M. M. (2012). Are RIASEC Interests Traits? Evidence Based on Self–Other Agreement. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(4), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712448895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712448895
Nurlina, A. (2018). PEMAHAMAN PEMILIHAN PEMINATAN AKADEMIK PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X SMAN 5 TANGERANG TAHUN 2017-2018. Jurnal Penelitian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/jpbk.v3i1.3195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jpbk.v3i1.3195
Setiawan, A. S., & Alimah, S. (2019). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN VISUAL AUDITORY KINESTHETIC (VAK) TERHADAP KEAKTIFAN SISWA. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.7284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.7284
Siregar, R. (2018). Teaching model of visualisation, auditory and kinesthetic (VAK) to improve the economic education achievement. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 4(1), 06–10.
Sodowsky, G. R., Taffe, R. C., Gutkin, T. B., & Wise, S. L. (1994). Development of the Multicultural Counseling Inventory: A self-report measure of multicultural competencies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.2.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.2.137
Süerdem, A., & Erkök, B. (2016). Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter version of RIASEC in Turkish. SHS Web of Conferences, 26, 01063. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601063
Taconis, R., & Kessels, U. (2009). How Choosing Science depends on Students’ Individual Fit to ‘Science Culture.’ International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802050876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802050876
Vardarlı, B., Özyürek, R., Wilkins-Yel, K. G., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2017). Examining the structure of vocational interests in Turkey in the context of the personal globe model. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9338-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9338-6
Walsh, W. B., Savickas, M. L., & Hartung, P. (2013). Handbook of Vocational Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203143209
Wetzel, E., & Hell, B. (2014). Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models in Vocational Interest Measurement: An Illustration Using the AIST-R. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(4), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913508244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913508244
Wiyono, B. D., & Kholidya, C. F. (2018). The Development of Academic Self-Management Inventory of Vocational High School Students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2018). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2018), Surbaya, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.164